Fossil fuels. The biggest contributor to global warming and climate change.
Greenland is one nation which has decided to take climate change seriously.
In my hometown San Francisco, as in the rest of America, most people take climate change seriously only as something to talk about over a cafe latte.
The danger of climate change is a clear and present danger, provided it doesn’t impact the fossil fuel consuming car owners ability to drive their vehicles anyplace at anytime.
No single issue gets San Franciscans more bellicose than having their right to drive their car questioned. Perhaps this international City which likes to think itself as progressive should check out Greenland for some inspiration.
Excerpted from Deutsche Welle 7.16.2021
Prospectors for new oil and gas reserves in Greenland can forget it: The arctic island government plans to stop issuing new licenses, saying it takes the “climate crisis seriously.”
Greenland’s natural resources minister Naaja Nathanielsen said the environment and climatic impacts of further oil and gas extraction had been assessed as being “too high” when weighed against potential financial gains, and was therefore being stopped.
And, not issuing further exploration licenses was a “natural step,” because Greenland took the “climate crisis seriously,” according to the vast Arctic island’s Cabinet led by Prime Minister Mute Agede.
“The future does not lie in oil. The future belongs to renewable energy, and in that respect we have much more to gain,” the cabinet said, stressing sustainable farming of its natural resources such as fisheries stemming from Inuit traditions.
Energy minister Kalistat Lund said Greenland was experiencing “the consequences of climate change in our country every day” and took ” climate change seriously.”
Its parliament, the Naalakkersuisut, was working to attract new investments “for the large hydropower potential that we cannot exploit ourselves,” Lund said.
“This step has been taken for the sake of our nature, for the sake of our fisheries, for the sake of our tourism industry, and to focus our business on sustainable potentials,” added Nathanielsen.
For the climate, but also down to scant scope for profit
However, the report also noted that the exploration work done in recent years suggested low profitability on most of the identified oil and gas reserves, with some even likely to cost more to extract than it would be worth.
Oil and gas exploration since the 1970s involved Shell, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Eni but drilling came up largely dry — despite US Geological Survey and Danish estimates of oil along Greenland’s west coast and gas off its east coast.
Greenland has issued four existing hydrcarbon licenses to two small companies, it cannot annul these as long as the companies continue operations at the sites.
“My understanding is that the [exploration] licenses that are left have very limited potential, Greenpeace Nordic’s general secretary told the weekly Danish tech-magazine Ingenioeren.
Arctic melting attributed to climate warning has also focused speculators on Greenland’s minerals, despite its current 85% ice sheet cover, anticipating that extraction might become easier with time.
But since April’s snap elections and a change in government, with Agede’s Inuit Ataqatigiit party taking power after a campaign with a heavy focus on natural resource policies, political bids to limit such activities have started to pick up pace.
Currently drafted in is parliament is a bill to ban in the future “preliminary investigation, exploration and extraction of uranium.”
Vast island with partial independence from Denmark
Greenland, populated by just 57,000 people, mainly around the capital Nuuk, has long sought more independence from Denmark.
The world’s largest island spans 2,166,086 square kilometers (836,330 square miles), slightly larger than Saudi Arabia or Mexico or Indonesia.
https://www.dw.com/en/greenland-stops-oil-and-gas-exploration-climate-costs-too-high/a-58294024
Lee's Perspective 