Fearful moderates rip ‘socialist’ Bernie. Warren is a Progressive who can win

Until the Democrat convention this summer I am solidly supporting Elizabeth Warren. I think she is the most credible and qualified candidate.

Should Bernie Sanders gain the Democratic Party nomination I will enthusiastically support him. It is appalling that the Mainstream Media is pounding on Bernie for making a favorable comment about Fidel Castro’s Cuba.  This line of attack will continue unabated all year.

Senator Warren is someone against whom the Bloviation Crowd will have a tough time destroying. The question for Elizabeth Warren, “Will she brawl with the Red Meat crowd?”

Perhaps Senator Warren is too decent a person to withstand the vicious state of American national politcs.   In the latest issue of the New York Review of Books is an article titled “Warren in the Trap.” The gist of the article is that Senator Warren is too much the academe and not the brawler.   Plus, she’s woman.  The last sentence in the article reads,

“When you’re in a knife fight you don’t ask to be liked.”

https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2020/03/12/elizabeth-warren-in-the-trap/

 

San Francisco Chronicle 2.25.2020

Now that Sen. Bernie Sanders has the inside track for the Democratic presidential nomination, his rivals are attacking him for being a democratic socialist — warning that he wouldn’t just lose to President Trump, but could destroy Democrats’ campaigns up and down the ballot.

Pete Buttigieg and Mike Bloomberg, both running to the right of Sanders, have been especially vocal since the Vermont independent’s victory in the Nevada caucuses Saturday. Bloomberg likened Sanders’ views to communism, and Buttigieg said he could water down the Democratic Party’s perceived stance against dictatorships.

“There will be a lot of Democrats — from statehouse to Senate — who are on the ticket with him that would distance themselves from his ideology or some of his positions,” Addisu Demissie, who managed New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker’s presidential campaign, told The Chronicle’s “It’s All Political” podcast. “This biggest challenge with a Sanders nomination will be, how does the party come together?”

Bernie 2.25.2020.jpg

Still, Demissie said, “I think he can beat President Trump.”

While the attacks coming from the Democratic presidential field on Sanders may be new, more than 6 in 10 voters know that Sanders is a socialist, according to a survey this month by Yahoo News/YouGov.

But the survey found that many didn’t know the difference between the “socialism” of Fidel Castro’s Cuba and Sanders’ version of “democratic socialism,” which he says is the modern extension of President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal programs. The survey found that 38% of respondents said the two were the same and 38% said they were different. The rest weren’t sure.

The bigger challenge for Sanders: Only 35% of respondents said they would consider voting for a socialist.

The Cold War version of socialism in Castro’s Cuba is one of total government control over industry and the media. Sanders’ form of democratic socialism is more like that found in Scandinavian countries, where the government provides health care and free college.

“Most proponents of social democracy see it as a way of smoothing capitalism’s rough edges,” according to “Socialism: A Short Primer” from the Brookings Institution, “making it more humane, egalitarian, and protective, rather than replacing the market outright.”

“The important word in “democratic socialism” isn’t socialism, it’s democratic,” wrote 1988 presidential candidate and civil rights activist Jesse Jackson. “Sanders isn’t talking about making America into Cuba or Venezuela; he’s talking about extending social guarantees like those offered in most other advanced industrial states, invoking Denmark or Sweden.”

Sanders added the caveat that he condemned Castro for imprisoning political dissidents. “Unlike Donald Trump,” he said. “I do not think that Kim Jong Un is a good friend. I don’t trade love letters with a murdering dictator. Vladimir Putin, not a great friend of mine.”

Still, Buttigieg said Sanders’ praise of Castro’s literacy campaign glossed over the late Cuban leader’s atrocious record on human rights.

At Tuesday’s debate in South Carolina, Buttigieg said, “We’re not going to win these critical, critical House and Senate races if people in those races have to explain why the nominee of the Democratic Party is telling people to look at the bright side of the Castro regime.”

Bloomberg’s campaign points to a survey of voters in 42 battleground House districts conducted for his campaign. It found that “a plurality of voters (39%) say they will be less likely to vote for a Democrat for Congress if Sanders is the Democratic nominee for president and his socialist ideas are in the Democratic platform.”

Rep. Harley Rouda, D-Laguna Beach, who won a Republican-held Orange County district in 2018, told The Chronicle on Tuesday that “I’m a little concerned that anybody that far left is going to help me in my district — unless we can overcome the votes lost by additional ones he can bring in.”

Rouda, who has endorsed Bloomberg, said “it was hard to say” if Sanders could make up that difference in his district, where Republicans outnumber Democrats.

There are signs, however, that many Democrats don’t think Sanders is out of bounds. In a national Washington Post/ABC News survey of Democratic-leaning adults, 62% found Sanders to be “about right” ideologically — roughly the same as Buttigieg and former Vice President Joe Biden.

Some top California Democrats say they aren’t worried that Sanders’ ideology will drag down the party in November.

“As a strong supporter of Joe Biden, I have never bought that narrative,” Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti said last week while campaigning with Biden in Las Vegas. “He’s always matched up second best (against Trump), and in some of the key states he matches up almost as well as Joe.

“When people say, ‘We need a centrist,’ or ‘We need a lefty person,’ this isn’t about where in that narrow band of Democrats they are,” Garcetti said. “It’s more about, ‘Who gives a feeling of hope to people who feel left behind?’ Joe does that, absolutely. I think Bernie does that for a lot of people, too.”

California Democratic Party chairman Rusty Hicks isn’t concerned about losing down-ballot races should Sanders be the party’s standard-bearer.

“I’m more focused on other things,” Hicks told The Chronicle.

Four first-term Democratic House members are up for re-election in Orange County districts that they took from the GOP in 2018. But the county’s Democratic chairwoman, Ada Briceño, said she didn’t think Sanders would hurt their chances. The county party has not endorsed a presidential candidate.

“I’m not of that opinion,” said Briceño, who is backing Sanders. “There is a certain energy that his candidacy brings. I’m seeing that among Latinos and among young people.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi steered clear of the controversy during a visit Monday to San Francisco. “I wish everyone well in this presidential race,” she said. “Whoever wins will be heartily embraced.”

https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Rivals-rip-socialist-Bernie-Sanders-It-may-15083567.php#photo-19088159

The whole world’s watching Julian Assange’s extradition hearing in London

Julian Assange is in the crosshairs of the American government because he made public the reality of how American leadership conducts its affairs.

The American government wants to imprison Julian Assange for life.

Julian Assange is someone who should be receiving accolades and not be the subject of prosecution and persecuation.

Hopefully the Brits will ignore the Americans extradition request and let Julian Assange continue to bring the goings on of government to the light of day.

Deutsche Welle 2.24.2020

A London court on Monday began hearing the case for the extradition of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange to the United States, a day after hundreds of protesters marched through the British capital demanding his release.

Hundreds of people including Roger Waters, the co-founder of the rock band Pink Floyd, marched through London on Saturday in a show of support for Assange. A number of prominent German politicians and intellectuals also signed an open letterappealing for his release earlier this month.

In their opening remarks, both the defense and the prosecution teams laid out their cases.

Assange’s lawyer, Edward Fitzgerald, said his client should not be extradited as he would not get a fair trial and would be a suicide risk. Fitzgerald said sending him to the US would expose Assange to inhumane and degrading treatment, as well as disproportionate sentence and prison conditions.

Julian Assange Extraditiion I 2.24.2020

Fitzgerald added the extradition request was motivated by politics. The indictment was brought, “not on the basis of new revelations, but because it had become politically expedient and desirable,” Fitzgerald said.

He said the United States’ attitude to Assange had changed when Donald Trump came to power and that the president wanted to make an example of his the 48-year-old.

Fitzgerald said in 2013 the US government under former President Barack Obama had decided that Assange should not face any action. But that in 2017, after the 2016 election of Trump, an indictment was brought against Assange.

Why the change? “The answer is President Trump came into power with a new approach to freedom of speech and a new hostility to the press amounting effectively to declaring war on investigative journalists,” Fitzgerald said.

The prosecution opens

The US government began outlining its case against Assange on Monday by arguing that the WikiLeaks founder is not a free-speech champion but an “ordinary” criminal who put many lives at risk with his actions.

Lawyer James Lewis, representing the US government, called WikiLeaks’ 2010 document deluge “one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of the United States.”

“Reporting or journalism is not an excuse for criminal activities or a license to break ordinary criminal laws,” he added.

The 48-year-old Australian is accused of publishing secret documents and violating anti-espionage law in the US, and faces up to 175 years in prison if convicted.

Washington has sought his extradition for years. Assange has fought being transferred to the US since he was arrested in April last year.

A decision by the London court is not expected before May 18.

Read more: Opinion: I am Julian Assange

‘Journalism is not a crime’

In 2010, Wikileaks published hundreds of thousands of secret papers on the internet, mainly pertaining to the Iraq war.

The papers contained sensitive information about US operations in the country, including the killing of civilians and the mistreatment of prisoners.

Assange, his lawyers, and supporters argue that the whistleblower activist would not receive a fair trial in the US.

The Council of Europe’s human rights commissioner Dunja Mijatovic has also urged Britain not to hand him over, saying that press freedom and the rights of whistleblowers are at stake.

“The broad and vague nature of the allegations…are troubling as many of them concern activities at the core of investigative journalism in Europe and beyond,” Mijatovic said.

Protesters carried signs that said, “Free Julian Assange,” and “Journalism is not a crime.”

Assange’s father John Shipton addressed the crowd. He said the long confinement had damaged his son’s health and that extraditing him the US would be the same as a death sentence.

https://www.dw.com/en/julian-assanges-extradition-hearing-begins-in-london/a-52496559

Will the Complicit Media collude to have Fascism Prevail in November??

February 23, 2020

Trump v Bernie

I am at peace with myself

If a Fascist can destroy a Democratic Socialist in November it is the unwavering message that this is what Americans want.

The mainstream media is in “full blown freak out mode.” This is just part of the upcoming campaign to destroy Bernie Sanders and ensure Trump’s four more years.

During Weimar Germany (1918-1933) the mainstream Media facilitated the rise of Nazism. History repeats itself in America nearly 100 years later.

👽

Trump the Dictator 1.26.2019

Common Dreams 2.23.2020

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/02/23/msnbc-full-blown-freakout-mode-bernie-sanders-cements-status-democratic-frontrunner

Bernie Sanders Wins Nevada Caucuses, Strengthening His Drive to Nomination

Breaking News 4.15.2019

Now that Bernie Sanders is beginning the inexorable march toward being the Democrats nominee it will be fascinating to read and view the treatment he is given by the Mainstream Media.

Excerpted from New York Times 2.22.2020

His triumph will provide a burst of momentum that may make it difficult for the still-fractured moderate wing of the Democratic Party to slow his march to the nomination.

LAS VEGAS — Senator Bernie Sanders claimed a major victory in the Nevada caucuses on Saturday that demonstrated his broad appeal in the first racially diverse state in the presidential primary race and established him as the clear front-runner for the Democratic nomination.

In a significant show of force, the progressive Mr. Sanders was leading his nearest rivals by a significant amount in early tallies, and The Associated Press named him the winner on Saturday evening.

His triumph in Nevada, after strong performances in Iowa and New Hampshire, will propel him into next Saturday’s primary in South Carolina, and the Super Tuesday contests immediately thereafter, with a burst of momentum that may make it difficult for the still-fractured moderate wing of the party to slow his march.

Mr. Sanders’s success, and the continued uncertainty over who is his strongest would-be rival, makes it less clear than ever how centrist forces in the party can organize themselves for a potentially monthslong nomination fight. The moderate wing is still grappling with an unusually crowded field for this late in the race, no clear alternative to Mr. Sanders and no sign that any of those vying for that role will soon drop out to hasten a coalescence.

Jeff Adachi. Standout People’s Advocate

IT IS ONE YEAR SINCE SAN FRANCISCO LOST ONE OF ITS PRIME ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE FOR ALL PEOPLE.

leeheidhues's avatarLee's Perspective

February 24, 2019

Jeff Adachi.  One of a kind.

The phrase “irreplaceable” is the only way to describe the loss of Jeff and what will be missed with his sudden departure from the scene.

Personally, I am devastated. 

I first saw Jeff Adachi speak in 1999 at the Golden Gate University Law School. I was totally swept away by his intelligence, knowledge and unwavering advocacy for his clients.

During the past 20 years I followed Jeff’s career, his zealous defense of his clients and his unabashed willingness to call out law enforcement for its inappropriate and, some time, illegal behavior.

One can only hope that whoever steps into Jeff’s position as Public Defender will bring a similar commitment to serving Justice and calling out law enforcement.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Adachi

View original post

‘It’s a cycle’: the disproportionate toll of homelessness on San Francisco’s blacks

The Guardian far away in London has this report about the Black homeless population in San Francisco famous for its cable cars, Fisherman’s Wharf and Boudin French bread.

There is also a hungry underbelly which escapes the notice of most San Franciscans.

The Guardian 2.21.2020

In a city where the homeless population is 37% black, having a job doesn’t mean you can afford housing

When Tracey Mixon walks out her door in San Francisco’s Tenderloin neighborhood, she is more likely to meet another black person than in most places in the city.

 

The Tenderloin is where many of the city’s homeless services are centered, making it a hub for the unhoused as they seek help. In a city where the black population teeters between 5% and 6%, 37% of its growing homeless population is black. “They sleep outside of my building,” Mixon, 49, said.

“They’re people I’ve known for years. They went from having places to live to being out out there on the streets. With me living in the Tenderloin, I see a lot of these people all the time and it hurts for me to see so many black people out there.”

In a state where a housing crisis has given way to a surge in homelessness, a disproportionate number of those experiencing housing instability are black. In Los Angeles, 37.5% of the homeless population is black, while in Oakland, where 70% of the homeless population is black, whole homeless encampments are dedicated to black and Latinx people.

homeless in San Francisco 2.21.2020.jpg

The disparity is reflected nationwide. Although black people made up 13.4% of the overall population, according to the latest US census data, 39.8% of all homeless people were black.

Mixon joined a group with the Coalition on Homelessness on Thursday, going from office to office in San Francisco City Hall to bring attention to this racial disparity during Black History Month. Just nine months ago, Mixon was homeless too, along with her nine-year-old daughter. For almost a year, she said, she and her daughter lived in shelters, hotel rooms and on the couches of family and friends.

“It was tough,” said Mixon, who is now a peer organizer for the Coalition on Homelessness. “I made sure she was in school every day. I made sure I was at work every day. Just because we were homeless, I didn’t want our routine to be stopped.”

More and more throughout California, the homeless find themselves in similar circumstances as Mixon and her daughter: holding down jobs, making a decent living, going to school – just not able to find an affordable place to live.

In the office of the San Francisco lawmaker Rafael Mandelman, Miquesha Willis broke down in tears talking about her current situation.Willis, 32, makes $30 an hour at her construction job. But she and her two-year-old son are homeless, staying with her mother on good days and scrambling to find shelter on bad days.

In cities like San Francisco, black communities are getting pushed out as rent prices get jacked up. Between the 2000 and 2010 censuses, the black population fell by 19% in San Francisco and almost 23% in Oakland. Black residents are forced to move farther inland to places where housing is cheaper, such as Antioch and Stockton – even though for many, their jobs remain in the city.

Willis tried moving to Antioch but couldn’t make the commute work. Her job required her to clock in before public transportation began running on some days, and her car broke down, making it impossible for her to get to work.

Like so many people her age, Willis is questioning what she wants to do for a living – if it would be worth it to finish college, to try starting her own business, to switch careers. San Francisco made its name this century as the hub for the latest tech boom, where anyone with a startup idea could come and achieve their dreams. But Willis has found that San Francisco is only a welcoming place only for some, for those who can afford the privilege to fail.

“There are people who are trying to make things happen for themselves and trying to grow in their career and make something happen for their families,” she said. “This is one of the highest-paying cities. Why are so many people struggling here?”When Tracey Mixon walks out her door in San Francisco’s Tenderloin neighborhood, she is more likely to meet another black person than in most places in the city.

The Tenderloin is where many of the city’s homeless services

are centered, making it a hub for the unhoused as they seek help. In a city where the black population teeters between 5% and 6%, 37% of its growing homeless population is black. “They sleep outside of my building,” Mixon, 49, said.

“They’re people I’ve known for years. They went from having places to live to being out out there on the streets. With me living in the Tenderloin, I see a lot of these people all the time and it hurts for me to see so many black people out there.”

In a state where a housing crisis has given way to a surge in homelessness, a disproportionate number of those experiencing housing instability are black. In Los Angeles, 37.5% of the homeless population is black, while in Oakland, where 70% of the homeless population is black, whole homeless encampments are dedicated to black and Latinx people.

The disparity is reflected nationwide. Although black people made up 13.4% of the overall population, according to the latest US census data, 39.8% of all homeless people were black.

Mixon joined a group with the Coalition on Homelessness on Thursday, going from office to office in San Francisco City Hall to bring attention to this racial disparity during Black History Month. Just nine months ago, Mixon was homeless too, along with her nine-year-old daughter. For almost a year, she said, she and her daughter lived in shelters, hotel rooms and on the couches of family and friends.

“It was tough,” said Mixon, who is now a peer organizer for the Coalition on Homelessness. “I made sure she was in school every day. I made sure I was at work every day. Just because we were homeless, I didn’t want our routine to be stopped.”

More and more throughout California, the homeless find themselves in similar circumstances as Mixon and her daughter: holding down jobs, making a decent living, going to school – just not able to find an affordable place to live.

In the office of the San Francisco lawmaker Rafael Mandelman, Miquesha Willis broke down in tears talking about her current situation.

miquesha willis
 Miquesha Willis, center with a folder, is homeless despite her job in contstruction. Photograph: Vivian Ho/The Guardian

Willis, 32, makes $30 an hour at her construction job. But she and her two-year-old son are homeless, staying with her mother on good days and scrambling to find shelter on bad days.

In cities like San Francisco, black communities are getting pushed out as rent prices get jacked up. Between the 2000 and 2010 censuses, the black population fell by 19% in San Francisco and almost 23% in Oakland. Black residents are forced to move farther inland to places where housing is cheaper, such as Antioch and Stockton – even though for many, their jobs remain in the city.

Willis tried moving to Antioch but couldn’t make the commute work. Her job required her to clock in before public transportation began running on some days, and her car broke down, making it impossible for her to get to work.

Like so many people her age, Willis is questioning what she wants to do for a living – if it would be worth it to finish college, to try starting her own business, to switch careers. San Francisco made its name this century as the hub for the latest tech boom, where anyone with a startup idea could come and achieve their dreams. But Willis has found that San Francisco is only a welcoming place only for some, for those who can afford the privilege to fail.

“There are people who are trying to make things happen for themselves and trying to grow in their career and make something happen for their families,” she said. “This is one of the highest-paying cities. Why are so many people struggling here?”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/feb/21/san-francisco-bay-area-homelessness-african-americans

Germany and right-wing extremism: The new dimension of terror

Americans are fixated on the sentencing of Trump’s Fool Roger Stone and the Bloviator in Chief’s dismantling of America’s legal framework.

And well they should be.  

What is happening in America is occuring in Germany, too in a very nihilistic and violent level. When the Nazis are in the ascendancy violence and mayhem are the order of the day.

Watch out America. Your turn to Fascism is rapidly approaching.

Deutsche Welle 2.20.2020

German Officials have said a deadly shooting was the result of deep-seated racism, which the suspected perpetrator had posted about online. The attack came hours after the German government approved an online hate speech bill.

A gunman by the name of Tobias R. is thought to have killed nine people and injured at least four in two shisha bars in the city of Hanau, not far from Frankfurt. He then went home where he is suspected of killing his mother before killing himself. He left behind a letter and video in which he claimed responsibility.

Ahead of the attack, he is suspected of having spread racist, xenophobic and anti-Semitic hate speech and conspiracy theories online. Federal prosecutors are now investigating whether he had any contact with other far-right terrorists. Peter Beuth, the interior minister of the state of Hesse, has said that he was not known to the authorities before.

Read moreFederal prosecutors take over Hanau attack investigation — live updates

The attack is a clear indication: Far-right terrorism is on the rise in Germany. A spokesperson for the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) told the German media outlet Redaktionsnetzwerk Deutschland that it currently had a list of 60 people that it officially considered as right-wing extremist Gefährder, a criminal designation for suspects considered threats to public safety.

From threats to action

According to the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, Germany’s domestic security agency, some 12,700 far-right extremists are “oriented toward violence.” With more and more communication taking place online, radicalization is happening at a faster pace. The members of a recently dismantled right-wing terrorist cell were allegedly radicalized online. This was also the case of Stephan B, who last October attacked a synagogue in Halle in eastern Germany on Yom Kippur, Judaism’s holiest day, with the intention of committing a massacre. He failed to get into the building but still killed two people before being arrested.

Germany’s security services face two serious problems when confronting ideological extremism: They need to be able to detect who could be likely to go beyond their fantasies of violence and commit actual attacks, and they also need to find out where the inspiration and funds are coming from. Prosecutor Christoph Hebbecker from the Federal Criminal Police Office’s Cologne-based cybercrime division told DW that since February 2018 there there have been about 1,000 criminal complaints that authorities suspect were committed by the far right. About half of them had culminated in charges being filed, because the anonymity of online forums makes tracking difficult for authorities, Hebbecker said.

Watch video01:36

Members of German far right terror cell arrested

Terrorist cell dismantled

Just last week, German police conducted raids on 13 apartments across the country and dismantled a terror cell that was allegedly planning to plunge Germany into a “state of civil war” by committing “as yet undefined” attacks on politicians, asylum-seekers and Muslims. Four suspected would-be attackers were arrested, as well as another eight individuals suspected of supporting them.

At first glance, it would seem that the police, security services and prosecutors were able to stop a terrorist group with fixed plans. But the challenged facing investigators is now to provide evidence that is sufficiently convincing that the suspected plotters are put on trial.

The difficulty of doing so is well illustrated in the case of Franco A., a lieutenant in the Bundeswehr, Germany’s armed forces. Franco A. was suspended and arrested in 2017 after being charged with the “preparation of a serious act of violent subversion.” He spent seven months in pre-trial custody, accused of wanting to commit attacks on famous politicians, including now-Foreign Minister Heiko Maas and Vice-President of the German Bundestag, Claudia Roth. Although there was evidence that he had stockpiled weapons and explosives and the names of potential victims were known, the Frankfurt Higher Regional Court dropped the charge that he was planning a terrorist attack on the basis that there was “insufficient evidence.” The court found that he had a “racist ethno-nationalist and anti-Semitic attitude” but said that it was also “highly probable” that he had not yet made a “firm decision” to carry out any attacks.

Read more: Over 500 suspected right-wing extremists in Bundeswehr

The Federal Court of Justice — Germany’s highest criminal court — has since instructed the Frankfurt Higher Regional Court to open criminal proceedings, but no trial date has been set. The tug-of-war shows how high the legal hurdles can be in Germany despite numerous adjustments to the law. It is thus not at all certain that the 12 detained last week will end up on trial.

Cracking down on racist hatred online and offline

Despite the difficulties in tracking and prosecuting those who radicalize online, the German government is taking steps to tackle online hatred even if it does not extend to physical violence. Last month, Interior Minister Horst Seehofer announced a ban on neo-Nazi terrorist organization Combat 18. And on Wednesday, the government approved a bill that aims to crack down on hate speech. If it is signed into law, as is expected, death and rape threats made online could be punished with up to three years’ imprisonment. The maximum punishment is currently one year. Even harsher sentence of up to five years could be applied in cases targeting local politicians with slander and hostility.

Watch video02:46

Germany’s far-right ‘enemy lists’

The bill comes in the wake of increasing online threats against politicians across Germany. Regional politician Walter Lübcke, a member of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservative Christian Democrats (CDU) and a supporter of her welcoming policy toward asylum-seekers, had received a number of threats before he was shot dead in front of his house in June last year. Police believe a far-right extremist motive was behind the killing; the suspect in custody is an avowed right-wing extremist who had issued death threats online.

Politicians are also hoping to combat online extremism by requiring internet sites such as Facebook to report certain forms of hate speech and propaganda to the Federal Criminal Police Office, whose president Holger Münch has been cracking down on the far right. The Cologne-based cybercrime division cooperates closely with the media and the Association of the Internet Industry (eco) and has been able to identify 130 individuals suspected of online hate crimes from Germany and abroad over the past two years.

However, prosecutor Hebbecker could not say how often such cases had actually resulted in a trial and was not aware of any suspect who had received a sentence without parole. He said that the division generally dealt with individuals operating as a “lone wolf” who were sometimes known but that there were others who had “never yet turned up in a case file.” He said that he could not detect any “big, organized structures.” He found one aspect of his research particularly surprising: such suspects clearly displayed a “clear far-right ideology” but did not consider themselves to be right-wing extremists.

Watch video01:36

 

Feds Invade California. “These actions make us all less safe,” says SF DA

The strongarm tactics by Federal authorities arresting people in a State courthouse invasion is an assault on the rights of States to protect the undocumented.

Chesa Boudin ran on a platform of changing the criminal justice system.  He is keeping his campaign vows. He condemned the Federal authorities strongarm tactics.

Excerpted from San Francisco Chronicle 2.19.2020

Federal immigration officials said they arrested two people Tuesday at Sonoma County Superior Court, a move that infuriated immigrant rights activists and local officials who said the action will have a chilling effect on undocumented communities coming forward when crimes are committed.

San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin  issued a statement slamming the arrests. “ICE actions at courthouses undermine our ability to hold defendants accountable by deterring undocumented victims and witnesses from cooperating with the justice system,” he said. “These actions make all of us less safe.”

ICE Arrests II 2.19.2020

“We want to remind all of our residents that the city and county of San Francisco is a sanctuary city,” Mayor London Breed said in a video statement, which also featured Police Chief Bill Scott. “We will continue to do everything we can to support our immigrant communities.”

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, known as ICE, informed the county Sheriff’s Office around 7:45 a.m. Tuesday that federal agents would be present at the courthouse. By the time the court’s morning sessions were under way after 9 a.m., ICE had made its arrests, according to the office of county District Attorney Jill Ravitch.

The district attorney’s office said ICE arrested “at least three” individuals in and around the courthouse. But ICE on Wednesday said it arrested two people: Antonio Hernandez Lopez and Pedro Romero Aguirre, both undocumented immigrants from Mexico.

The arrests mark the latest episode in the standoff between federal immigration officials and local authorities that adhere to city, county and state sanctuary policies. Elected officials in Sonoma County and the Bay Area at large condemned Tuesday’s arrests, which they say put communities at risk by creating an environment where people fear going to court or cooperating with law enforcement.

“Public safety partners have worked with the immigrant community to foster trust. This action will impact that effort,” Ravitch’s office said in a statement Wednesday. “It is essential that victims and witnesses feel safe to report their experiences so that we can hold the guilty accountable.”

In a joint statement several officials released, Sonoma County Public Defender Kathleen Pozzi said, “ICE operations have no place in the court building.”

ICE defended the arrests Wednesday, arguing it has the legal authority to detain the men, who have criminal convictions and several previous encounters with immigration authorities, the agency said.

The agency condemned California’s sanctuary policies and vowed to continue arresting immigrants who are in the country illegally.

“Our officers will not have their hands tied by sanctuary rules when enforcing immigration laws to remove criminal aliens from our communities,” said David Jennings, head of ICE’s San Francisco office, in a statement Wednesday.

The agency also said local jusridictions that choose not to cooperate with ICE “are likely to see an increase in ICE enforcement activity” because immigration officials will conduct a larger number of enforcement operations.

Santa Rosa Police arrested Lopez on Dec. 24 on suspicion of inflicting corporal injury to a spouse, driving under the influence and preventing a witness from reporting a crime, ICE said. The charges are pending. He has a 2005 DUI conviction and was arrested by ICE officers four times between 2004 and 2007, according to ICE. At some point, Lopez voluntarily left for Mexico and returned.

Aguirre has five criminal convictions spanning more than a decade, ICE said, including misdemeanor trespassing, driving without a license, driving under the influence, illegal entry and misdemeanor battery. The agency arrested him six times in 2010 — he returned voluntarily to Mexico three of those times and was ordered removed the remaing three times, ICE said.

Both men are in deportation proceedings.

Defense attorney Martin Woods said a client of his was scheduled to enter a plea for a misdemeanor DUI and domestic violence case Tuesday morning but never made it inside the building. Instead, his client was arrested in the parking lot around 8:30 a.m. Woods did not disclose the name of his client.

“He was on his way to court,” Woods said. “I really don’t know exactly what happened.”

Woods said he told the judge, who continued the case to March and asked for verification of the arrest. Woods said he had not spoken to his client.

Court officials in San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Napa and Contra Costa counties said they had not heard of similar arrests in their jurisdictions. Alameda and Marin counties court officials did not immediately respond to inquiries.

But concerns still mounted about the potential impact the arrests could introduce.

A spokesman for the Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office said the agency did not work with immigration officials on the arrests and it heard of the activity only when ICE called a dispatcher.

The arrests could affect all aspects of the judicial proceedings, Woods said, potentially resulting in defendants unwilling to go to courthouses and prosecutors who won’t be able to conclude cases because people won’t show up for their court appearances or to testify.

“It’s chaos,” Woods said. “Everybody at the courthouse is quite taken aback.”

 

Bernie takes aim at billionare Bloomberg. Northwest US rally draws thousands

Bernie Sanders terrifies corporate America, much of the Democratic Party and the mainstream media. Should he become President on January 20, 2021 the days of business as usual will be over.

It could be that Bernie Sanders will become the Democrats nominee. People who fear he can’t win the election are really afraid of what he would accomplish as President.  A massive shift in government priorities.

The American political campaign will be a brutal, nasty affair. Bernie will lay to waste the Trump administration, corporate America and the priviliged class. The Wall Street Journal is the best barometer in voicing the fears of the ruling class.

The Guardian 2.18.2020

Bernie Sanders railed against his fellow Democratic presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg during his first 2020 campaign visit to Washington state, as the billionaire continues to rise in the polls despite mounting criticism over his past remarks about women and minorities.

A new NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll published on Tuesday showed Sanders leading in the Democratic primary contest at 31% support nationally, with Bloomberg surging into second place with 19% support.

But the two put forward starkly different visions for the future of the Democratic party, and a post-Trump America.

Sanders called the programme “racist” and said it “caused communities of colour, African Americans and Latinos, to live in fear and humiliation in New York City”.

Speaking about inequality in America, he also called out Bloomberg’s wealth (he is estimated to be one of the 10 richest people in the world), which has repeatedly been a point of contention for many of his Democratic opponents.

“We have a corrupt political system which enables billionaires to buy elections,” he said. “So today we say to those billionaires who are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to support candidates who represent the rich and the powerful; today we say to Mayor Bloomberg: we are a democracy, not an oligarchy.”

Bloomberg has said he will not take political donations and is expected to work for only $1 a year if elected to the presidency.

The media mogul has also received recent criticism for comments he made four years ago in which he seemingly questioned the intelligence of American factory and farm workers, as well as comments he made in 2013, in which he compared local members of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and New York’s teachers union to the gun lobbying group the National Rifle Association (NRA).

According to Politico, a Bloomberg campaign spokesman, Stu Loeser, responded to the comments by saying, “reference to the [teachers union] was something Mike said in the heat of the moment that he now regrets.”

Sanders said: “As a United States senator, I truly appreciate the power of the corporate elites and the 1%; they have endless and I mean endless amounts of money. They own, to a large degree, the media; they have tremendous control over our economy; they are very, very powerful. But at the end of the day, we are the 99%.”

Sanders’ extremely positive showings in Iowa and New Hampshire boosted his chances of winning the Democratic nomination and ultimately beating Donald Trump. In an unorthodox strategy, Bloomberg skipped the early states, and will instead enter the race on Super Tuesday on 3 March.

People line up at a campaign rally for Bernie Sanders at the Tacoma Dome.
People line up at a campaign rally for Bernie Sanders at the Tacoma Dome. 

In 2016, Sanders won Washington’s Democratic caucuses. The state has since switched to the primary system and moved up its vote to 10 March.

Sanders has raised over $2m in Washington state, the most of any Democratic presidential candidate, according to the Seattle Times, which cited data through the end of 2019 from the Federal Election Commission. The Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren and former South Bend, Indiana, mayor Pete Buttigieg, were right behind, with about $1.6m and $1.5m raised respectively. Trump has brought in over $2.7m from the state.

Despite Sanders’ criticisms of Bloomberg, several of his supporters said they would still vote for the billionaire if he wins the nomination.

“I would be sorry to turn my back on a president who has manipulated and bought in order to get the position to go to somebody who would be a passable middle-of-the-road Republican, who also buys and barters for the position instead of turning to the people,” said Dusty Collings, 68, a Sanders supporter from Poulsbo, a small city north-west of Seattle.

But when asked during the rally whether she would support Bloomberg if he won the Democratic nomination, she didn’t hesitate. “I would vote for the Congress of tropical birds to get rid of Trump,” said Collings, an artist who was a Sanders caucus delegate for Washington state’s Kitsap county in 2016. “If that’s who we nominate, that’s who I will vote for.”

Ryan Hull, 20, said he supports Sanders primarily because of his stance on the environment. But the sophomore at Clark College, in Vancouver, Washington, who drove about two hours for the rally with his mom and sister, said if Bloomberg wins the nomination, he would ultimately vote for him.

“He shares enough of the same ideals for me that it’s not too big of a movement,” said Hull. But he said he would also just like to see Trump leave the White House, so “whoever’s going to win for the Democrats, that’s who I want,” he said.

However, not everyone at the rally shared that same sentiment. Leanne Young, 28, a Seattle resident, called Bloomberg “basically the Democratic version of Trump”, and said she would probably not vote for him if he’s the nominee because she doesn’t “see him being much better than Trump”.

Bloomberg, who launched his presidential campaign in November, will appear in Wednesday’s televised presidential debate in Las Vegas alongside Biden, Sanders, Warren Buttigieg and Senator Amy Klobuchar.

Bloomberg’s campaign said it was seeing a groundswell of support across the country and that qualifying for Wednesday’s debate is the latest sign that Bloomberg’s plan is resonating with more Americans.

The primetime event will be a stark departure from Bloomberg’s highly choreographed campaign. He has poured more than $300m into television advertising, a way to define himself for voters without facing criticism.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/feb/18/bernie-sanders-mike-bloomberg-washington-state

 

Wrongdoing Shall Not Prevail

San Francisco Outer Richmond District 2.16.2020

Kuan Yin, the beautiful statue of the goddess of compassion, rises tonight like the ancient Greek “Phoenix.” The new headless Kuan Yin obtains life from the ashes of her predecessor, the old complete Kuan Yin. The neighborhood has spoken. Vandals and degradation shall not remove the Peace of our neighborhood.

Several weeks ago mindless vandals destroyed the beautiful statue which has sat on the corner just three blocks from land’s end of San Francisco overlooking the Pacific Ocean.

The vandalism was akin to an unlawful assault on a neighborhood citizen.

The willful abuse provoked a heartfelt response of the mistreatment visited upon one of its neighborhood icons.

Kuan Yin is almost human in the adoration it draws from the citizenry.

Whether it be a vandalized work of art or a member of the neighborhood who is mistreated the people will speak out.

Kuan Yin III 2.16.2020.jpg