Berlin: Five year rent freeze a judicious move to ensure affordable housing

Last month Berlin instituted a five year rent freeze on many rental properties.

Berlin is just one City. It is a trendsetter and actions taken in the German capital have worldwide reprecussions.

Deutsche Welle 11.3.2019

Berlin’s brand-new rent freeze (and cap) is hardly unique among cities with pressured housing markets. But while other cities have stricter laws, Berlin’s new rent control has some more unique protections.

Around 1.5 million homes in Berlin will have their rents frozen for five years and capped at €9.80 ($10.90) per square meter, after the Berlin state government agreed a new rent control law on October 23.

The new measures were described as a “breathing space for tenants” by Housing Minister Katrin Lompscher on Tuesday.

The idea that a city with an acute housing shortage should introduce rent control is not exactly revolutionary, said Barbara Steenbergen, head of the EU liaison office at the International Union of Tenants (IUT).

“It’s nothing extremely special,” she told DW. “Actually I was more or less waiting for something to happen in Berlin.”

Berlin’s rent prices have been exploding, and as the city’s population grows by some 40,000 people a year, displacement of low-income communities and social inequality have been the inevitable result.

Last year, a Global Residential Cities Index published by property consultants Knight Frank found that Berlin’s rents were rising faster than anywhere else in the world: from 2017 to 2018 alone, rents rose by 21%, it said.

The law also says that landlords cannot charge rents higher than what the previous tenant paid, and, should their rent be above the limit set out in a “rent table,” tenants can even sue to have their rent lowered. These two measures are unique globally, according to international tenants’ organization, which says they represent the strongest part of Berlin’s law.

It was good news for Oleg Mirzac, one of the final holdouts in an apartment building in the north of Berlin, where new owners want to renovate and raise rents by as much as 140%.

He has lived there since 2003, when Berlin’s rents were less than half of what they are now, and when hardly anyone spent more than a quarter of their income on rent. He’s seen almost all his neighbors leave in the last few years as new owners have pressured them out to make way for expensive renovations.

Like many others in Berlin, Mirzac started a community tenants’ initiative, the Pankow Tenants Forum, to fight the price-out attempt in his building. He welcomes the new Berlin measures. “The rents have been rising nonstop for 10 years, and the incomes aren’t rising at all,” he told DW. “I think I speak for a lot of Berlin’s tenants when I say I welcome this, and hope it creates a barrier for property speculators.”

A freeze, and a cap 

The new law was passed by the Berlin state cabinet in late October after 12 hours of last-minute negotiations ironed out the final differences among the three government parties: the center-left Social Democrats (SPD), the socialist Left party and the Greens. It is expected to come into effect in January 2020.

The new freeze is not total. To encourage new construction, buildings built after 2014 will be exempt, as will government-owned social housing, where rents are controlled anyway, but an estimated three-quarters of apartments in Berlin will be covered. From 2022, landlords will be allowed to raise rents in line with inflation of 1.3% per year.

But despite warnings of a return to socialism from the political opposition, the regulations do little more than bring Berlin into line with legal situations already in place in other major cities that suffer chronic housing shortages and ballooning rents, including San Francisco, Oakland, New York, Vienna, Madrid, Barcelona and Amsterdam.

Rent protest (imago/Seeliger)Countless protests against soaring housing prices have sprung up in recent years in Germany

Read moreBerlin renters fight to save their homes from new buyers

In the last few years, Spain and the Netherlands have introduced nationwide rent control measures, as have four states in the US: California, New York, New Jersey and Maryland. Canada has had some form of rent regulation since 2006, while Paris, France, is already planning regulation, presumably waiting to see how Berlin’s legislation works out.

“There is a common understanding that it is necessary to regulate housing markets, because housing markets do not work by themselves,” Steenbergen added. “If you don’t regulate, there is always a shortage of cheap rental housing, while there is always enough expensive housing and property to buy, because that is where investors can make profits.”

Steenbergen says Berlin’s controls compare well with others, though they don’t go much further: In New York, San Francisco, the Netherlands and Spain, rents are also capped to inflation rates. In Spain, there is also a five-year minimum on rent contracts to protect against rent hikes.

Berlin now also has measures to control what she calls “ren-eviction”: that is, forcing poor tenants out by renovating the building to justify a massive rent hike – exactly what its happening to Oleg Mirzac in Pankow.

Under the new law, rents in Berlin’s renovated buildings can only go up by €1 per square meter. However, rules in the Netherlands are even stricter: 70% of a building’s tenants have to give their consent before any renovation can happen.

Pressure from new owners to force out their tenants can often be indirect. Mirzac says it started with cease-and-desist notices over bikes in the courtyard or shoes in the hallways, and moved up to court cases. He also says that construction workers broke his heating when other apartments were being modernized. “They walled up a fireplace I had that was necessary for ventilation,” he said.

The new Berlin law also follows the Netherlands and Spain in that it gives “extortionate rents” a legal definition, setting it at 120% of the value set out in the rent table.

If the rent is above that, Berlin tenants can sue to have their rent lowered, regardless of what it says in their contracts. They can even have their rent returned, which Steenbergen says is unique.

“This is really interesting,” she said. “This is something we should follow very closely. I think it’s going to be very hard to realize that.”

Read moreNo place to live: Germany’s daunting urban housing market

But the freeze has faced predictable criticism from some quarters: Associations of property developers, architects and construction companies wrote a joint open letter to the Berlin government predicting that the rent cap would see investment in property in the capital drop by 90% and would even endanger the construction industry.

https://www.dw.com/en/berlins-new-rent-freeze-how-it-compares-globally/a-50937652

 

Matt Gonzalez: Chief Attorney in Public Defender’s office All In for Chesa Boudin

Matt Gonzalez is one of the most respected public officials in San Francisco. He is Chief Trial Attorney in the Public Defenders office, a former President of the Board of Supervisors and Mayoral candidate who nearly defeated Gavin Newsom in 2003.

Matt is smart, articulate, street wise and has worked with Chesa Boudin for years.

Matt’s endorsement is thorough, detailed and debunks every bogus argument put forth by Chesa’s opponents. Specifically, Matt calls out the vicious and lie filled campaign now blanketing the airwaves and mailboxes in San Francisco.

Following the untimely death of Jeff Adachi last February, a vocal segment of San Franciscans urged that Matt Gonzalez be appointed Public Defender by the Mayor. He did not receive the appointment.

Anyone who really cares about who is elected District Attorney Tuesday and has any doubts about Chesa should read Matt’s words.

November 2, 2019

The link follows.

https://themattgonzalezreader.com/2019/11/02/chesa-boudin-for-district-attorney/

Who’s Afraid of Chesa Boudin?

The reactionary San Francisco Police Officers Association (POA) has mounted several T.V. and mail attacks that misrepresent what Boudin believes in. It’s their hope that voters will be frightened of a candidate who has pledged to hold police accountable and who has committed himself to implementing restorative justice and alternatives to incarceration. It remains to be seen whether anyone cares what the POA thinks, given that in the last San Francisco mayor’s race, their endorsed candidate finished with just 7% of the vote. Despite their unpopularity their PAC (and associated law enforcement PACs) have thus far spent an estimated $700,000 in this race, which is more than Boudin has raised, to try deterring voters from considering his candidacy.

Suzy and Greg Suhr 11.2.2019.jpeg

“Interim” DA Suzy Loftus and ex Chief Greg Suhr. He endorsed Suzy.

Why is the POA so invested in this election?

When considering the arguments the POA makes against Boudin, keep in mind that the POA doesn’t have the greatest track record for engaging in lawful activity and protecting San Franciscans. They vigorously defended their members who sent racist text messages on personal phones while on duty. These texts included use of the word “n — ,” as well as disparaging comments about LGBTQ persons. The POA also defended police officers who were ultimately convicted in federal court and sentenced to prison for writing false police reports and entering homes without warrants or consent in the Henry Hotel scandal. Could it be that the POA is afraid of Chesa Boudin because they know he will hold them accountable for their actions?

Message to Mayor. No more cronyism. Put winning DA in office immediately

The outrageous appointment of Suzy Loftus to the DA job 18 days before the November 5 vote has stirred outrage and controversy.

The last minute foisting of an “Interim” DA on the electorate is shocking in its brazenness even in jaded, cloistered San Francisco.

The “Interim” DA has used the past two weeks to stage a number of photo ops,  put forth proposals whose sole purpose is free publicity, and further her campaign assisted by a vicious, slanderous campaign against Chesa Boudin by the Police Officers Assocation PAC.

The Recorder 11.1.2019

Leif Dautch and Chesa Boudin vocalized their frustration with the appointment of candidate Suzy Loftus as interim district attorney in the run-up to the election and formally requested that Mayor Breed install Tuesday’s winner after the results are certified instead of waiting until the start of the new year.

SAN FRANCISCO—In a show of solidarity, two rival district attorney candidates joined forces on the steps of the Hall of Justice on Friday to call on Mayor London Breed to appoint the winner of next week’s election immediately after certification, rather than wait until the start of the new year.

With the hotly contested district attorney race just days away, Leif Dautch and Chesa Boudin vocalized their frustration with the appointment of candidate Suzy Loftus as interim district attorney and formally requested that Breed install the election’s winner after the results are tallied.

Leif and Chesa III 11.1.2019.jpg

Two former judges were on hand lending their support for Boudin and Dautch’s petition. Retired San Francisco Superior Court Judge Tomar Mason and retired Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Martha Goldin addressed the crowd of about two dozen of the candidates’ supporters, calling for the naming of the winner after the election.

“Both the use of the District Attorney’s Office for electioneering, and the influx of hundreds of thousands of dollars to oppose Chesa Boudin, constitute ethical and moral violations of voters’ rights,” Judge Goldin said.

Dautch said for the first time in 110 years there was not going to be an incumbent name on the ballot for district attorney, until two weeks ago when the mayor decided to put her thumb on the scale and install her preferred candidate. Boudin added, “Since then, we have seen daily press conferences, using district attorney staff resources and making announcements to benefit Loftus’ campaign, rather than purely serve the public good. It’s a disgraceful abuse of power.”

 

California murder. Result of unregulated AirBnB and apathetic small town cops.

These property owners who want to make an extra buck permit their homes to be rented to anyone and then blame AirBnb when terrible events occur.  Sorry, everyone is guilty. The property owner, AirBnb, the renters and, in this instance, the cops.

The worst case scenario ensued as four people are murdered on Halloween in sleepy Orinda.  The local cops are equally responsible as it took them nearly two hours to respond to calls from neighbors who have been complaining for months.

When the Orinda cops bestirred themselves to check it out, they found a scene of death and mayhem.

Excerpted from San Francisco Chronicle 11.1.2019

Before four people were shot dead and others were injured Thursday night at a Halloween house party in Orinda, neighbors complained about previous blowouts at the Airbnb rental home and the city sent the owners two “notices of violation,” The Chronicle has learned.

One neighbor said he emailed the city just a couple of hours before the shooting to complain about the Halloween party, as well as other large parties recently at the venue. That neighbor also called police. According to a timeline released by the city manager, the city received that email requesting code enforcement at the property at 9:35 p.m. Salomon confirmed that the neighbor called police about the unruly party around the same time.

Several people were killed and injured at a Halloween party in Orinda, Calif.

Neighbors began calling police around 9:15 p.m. to complain about a loud party. As deputies headed to the scene shortly before 11 p.m., four people were killed and others were wounded in the shooting.

Contra Costa County Sheriff’s spokesman Jimmy Lee declined to answer questions about why police didn’t respond to the home until nearly 11 p.m. — after the shooting — when the first call to police came at about 9:15 p.m.

Another neighbor, who declined to be identified by name, said he asked the city to shut down the short-term rental after “numerous very disruptive parties,” including one that caused “significant property damage” and bottles being thrown in the yard.

We “have begged anyone that will listen to help us terminate the short-term rental for this property. We have been unsuccessful,” he said.

What had been a neighborhood annoyance turned to a frightening scene Thursday.

Alan Smith, who lives about a block away from the home, said he and other neighbors complained multiple times to both the city and Airbnb about the home, which he said has been a “neighborhood nuisance for parties.”

“We had a pretty strong conversation with the owners, along with some documentation,” said Steve Salomon, Orinda’s city manager. “We felt that they had corrected their behavior, but obviously that didn’t happen.”

The city issued two violation notices to the property at 114 Lucille Way, one for exceeding the maximum occupancy and another for parking, Assistant City Planner Winnie Mui wrote in an email obtained by The Chronicle.

“The property owner has been told via phone, email, and letter of the short-term rental regulations,” Mui wrote. “Specifically, those regulations being that while the short-term rental is being rented, the maximum occupancy allowed on the lot is 13 people and that all vehicles associated with the short-term rental shall be parked onsite.”

The owners, Michael Wang and Wenlin Lou, later made changes to the short-term rental listing following the conversation. The city said the house was brought into compliance and the owners were not fined.

“They were very receptive and very cooperative, and said they would comply,” Salomon said.

Wang told The Chronicle that his wife handles their Airbnb listing, which noted that parties were not allowed after they had problems “maybe six to seven months ago, or even longer.” Airbnb’s listing for the four-bedroom home advertised it as a house that’s good for “business travelers, families and large groups.”

However, Salomon said the city had received a complaint about the property as recently as July, when someone complained about overflowing garbage.

Wang said he was frustrated with Airbnb, adding, “we can’t control” whether people flout the rules and have parties at the home.

“Airbnb does not release the customer information before they really book, so we have no way to know,” he said. “We also tell them there’s a maximum (number of) people and no parties, but people lie.”

After the shooting, the city asked Airbnb and the online service Booking.com to take down the listing, Salomon said. Airbnb said it had suspended the home’s listing.

 

Second big spill in two years. Keystone Pipeline leaks 383,000 gallons of oil.

While Washington is obsessing over Impeachment and the current disaster in the White House, out there in the real world the disastrous environmental effects of the huckster con man are being felt on a daily basis.

Washington Post 10.31.2019

Approximately 383,000 gallons of crude oil have spilled into a North Dakota wetland this week in the latest leak from the Keystone Pipeline, further fueling long-standing opposition to plans for the pipeline network’s extension.

“We’ve always said it’s not a question of whether a pipeline will spill, but when, and once again TC Energy has made our case for us,” Sierra Club associate director Catherine Collentine said in a statement.

“With each one of these major spills that happens on the Keystone pipeline system, it becomes clearer and clearer that this is not safe,” said Doug Hayes, an attorney leading the Sierra Club’s work on Keystone XL. Critics worry about a similar mishap contaminating one of the hundreds of waterways along Keystone XL’s expected path, he said.

Keystone III 10.31.2019.jpg

With about half an Olympic swimming pool’s worth of oil covering roughly half an acre, the leak is among the largest in the state, said Karl Rockeman, who directs the North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality’s division of water quality. But the spill does not appear to pose an immediate threat to public health, he added, as people do not live nearby and that the wetland is not a source of drinking water.

 

For environmental groups, though, the leak was further evidence that Canada-based pipeline owner TC Energy should not be allowed to build the controversial Keystone XL addition, which would stretch more than 1,000 miles from Alberta into the United States.

The Trump administration approved the plan in 2017 after years of protests, but the project was blocked by a federal judge who called for further study on environmental impacts.

 

TC Energy did not immediately respond to additional questions Thursday evening.

This week’s leak was Keystone’s second big one in two years. Many smaller spills have plagued the pipeline since it opened in 2010 to carry oil from Alberta to Texas.

That’s cause for concern, some experts say.

 

“It’s a valid ques­tion, two cracks on a fair­ly new pipe­line — geez, what’s going on?” Rich­ard Kuprewicz, the president of pipeline safety consulting company Accufacts, told the Star Tribune in Minneapolis.

Crews are still focused on recovering the oil and will shift later to fixing the pipeline, according to the company. Large stretches of Keystone have been shut down.

 

Exactly how much was released will not be clear until it’s all recovered, TC Energy said. The total for the Keystone pipeline’s 2017 gush onto South Dakota agricultural land ended up being revised significantly, from about 210,000 gallons to more than 400,000.

The 2017 spill was probably rooted in a crack caused by a vehicle during Keystone’s construction, the National Transportation Safety Board found. The crack likely grew over time, the board concluded.

Revelations of another rupture came as the State Department accepts comments on an environmental review of the hotly debated Keystone XL plan. The department’s public meeting about the review, held Tuesday in Montana, broke into shouting at times, the Associated Press reported.

“Yes, there’s a risk of an oil spill,” said one man whose farm is in the pipeline’s path and whom TC Energy is paying for property access, according to the Associated Press. “We have to be willing to take a risk. It’s a very minuscule chance.”

 

Montana state Sen. Frank Smith (D) countered that the oil line would eventually break and could jeopardize drinking water. “Obama did a really thorough investigation and decided it wouldn’t work,” he said, according to the Associated Press.

 

 

Nationals Win Their First World Series With One Last Rally

Breaking News 4.15.2019

The saying used to be, “First in War. First in Peace. Last in the American League.”  No more as the now National League Washington Nationals win it all.

New York Times 10.30.2019

NATIONALS 6, ASTROS 2 | WASHINGTON WINS SERIES, 4-3

After trailing for much of Game 7, the Washington Nationals mounted a comeback and overcame the Houston Astros to win their first World Series title as a franchise.

 

Germany combats far-right extremism and online hate speech. Is it enough?

The German government is doing what needs be done to stop the plague of far-right Neo Nazi violence. Will it be enough to stomp out this scourge?

Deutsche Welle 10.30.2019

After the deadly attack on a synagogue and killing of a politician, the German government has set out its new measures to tackle far-right extremist violence. Opposition politicians say the plans are long overdue.

What’s included in the new measures?

– According to the package, online service providers such as Facebook, YouTube and Twitter will be obliged to report hate speech to German authorities, and also pass on the IP address of the conspicuous user. Until now, such social media giants have only been required to delete hate speech within a certain time period.

– Gun laws will be tightened, with each request for a weapons permit to be checked by the BfV.

– Existing prevention programs that aim to tackle right-wing extremism, anti-Semitism, racism and enmity towards any targeted group will be developed and financing “maintained at a high level.”

– While local politicians will be afforded the same special protection against defamation and slander as state and federal politicians, attacks against paramedics and emergency medical professionals will be treated in the same way as resistance against enforcement officers. Legal changes will also make it easier for people threatened by far-right extremist violence to block access to their private email address.

Tightening of gun laws, more protection for political figures at all levels and an obligation to report online criminal content for social media networks such as Facebook, Youtube and Twitter: those were just some of the measures announced by the German government on Wednesday as part of a new strategy which aims to combat far-right extremism and hate speech on the internet.

For more than a year, Germany’s Interior and Justice Ministries have wrangled over the new bill, but recent far-right extremist violence in Germany resulted in the German Cabinet upping the tempo and hashing out a new packet months earlier than planned.
German anti Right Measures I 10.30.2019

In June, pro-refugee regional official Walter Lübcke was gunned down at his home in central Germany by a right-wing extremist. Just three weeks ago, a heavily armed man killed two people after trying and failing to carry out a mass shooting in the local synagogue in the eastern city of Halle.

Investigations into the suspect of the Halle attack have found that 27-year-old Stephan B. had often visited websites which circulated anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.

‘Actions, not just words’

Opposition demanding more

Already on Wednesday, opposition politicians were voicing their skepticism over how the obligation to report hate would be implemented. Konstantin von Notz, a Green Party politician who serves as the party’s internet policy spokesperson, told Deutschlandfunk radio that the online “big players” have so far been dealt with “very mildly,” adding that financial penalties for not reporting and deleting hate speech should be in the “high tens and hundreds of millions.”

“Otherwise you won’t be able to hold these companies to account…This is the only lever you can use to deal with corporations that follow an economic, stock company logic,” von Notz said, adding that the measures were “long overdue.”

After the terrorist attack in Halle, it was important that the “government’s words were followed by actions,” German Interior Minister Horst Seehofer (CSU) said on Wednesday.

Similarly, Justice Minister Christine Lambrecht (SPD) said the German government “is confronting right-wing extremism and anti-Semitism by all means enabled by of the rule of law.”

“What the disinhibition and unleashing of hatred in the net can lead to was shown again in the terrible attack on the Jewish community in Halle,” she added.

Several new measures are included in the new package which will see Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, the BfV, taking on a more prominent role in the monitoring and prosecution of hate online.

Read more: German synagogue attacker’s online extremist circles revealed

The business-friendly Free Democrats (FDP) also expressed doubts about the effectiveness of the new measures. “Obligating sites to disclose information will not effectively combat hate crime,” said FDP politican Benjamin Strasser.

Meanwhile, Germany’s Data Protection Commission said it will be observing the developments closely as Wednesday’s proposals move toward becoming law.

“At this point it’s too early to say whether this is good or bad,” commission spokesperson Dirk Hensel told DW. “But there will certainly be questions to be asked regarding the ethics of private companies deeming what counts as a conspicuous post on social media.”

Complications could also arise if a referral turns out to be a mistake, by which point private data will already have been shared between private companies and German domestic intelligence.

 

https://www.dw.com/en/germany-announces-plans-to-combat-far-right-extremism-and-online-hate-speech/a-51049129

Vocal response to red baiting scurrilous POA attacks on Chesa Boudin

October 29, 2019

The response to the scurrilous red baiting attacks on District Attorney candidate Chesa Boudin has been fierce.  

People familiar with the grandstanding and character assassination engaged in by the Police Officers Assocation are speaking out in no uncertain terms.

Defamatory lies, distortions. POA tries to destroy DA candidate Chesa Boudin

October 28, 2019

Post by Lee Heidhues

The San Francisco Police Officers Association (POA) is engaged in a last minute vicious attempt to confuse the electorate and deny the District Attorney’s office to Chesa Boudin.

City mailboxes have been sullied with two hate filled and defamatory mailers in the last week. Both mailers left ethics, integrity and decency on the cutting room floor.

Chesa 10.28.2019

The POA mailers are a sad commentary on the State of Play in local politics and the San Francisco District Attorney race in particular. The POA through its well financed PAC has sunk to depths of personal and professional destruction that are rare even in the hardball world of San Francisco politics.

Chesa Boudin is a threat to the ironclad hold the cops have on City Hall.

Beyond the nice photo ops that the cops put out in the public arena to burnish their reputation, the reality is often something else. The cops are the enforcers of the State and anyone who threatens their hegemony is a marked man.

Chesa Boudin is the latest target

“Lock him up!!!” Fans blast Donald Trump as he looks on at World Series

When is this Guy going to resign….so he can be indicted???

The Guardian 10.27.2019

Donald Trump once claimed he was courted by several major league baseball clubs in his youth but turned them down because they couldn’t offer him enough money. On Sunday, baseball got its revenge.

Lock Him Up II  10.27.2019.jpg

The President attended Game 5 of the World Series between the Washington Nationals and Houston Astros at Nationals Park, a short journey from the White House. When Trump was shown on the video screens in the stadium he was loudly booed by fans. That, perhaps, was predictable: Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon and both Bushes were all booed while attending baseball games as President. What came shortly afterwards was a little more personal in a city that is heavily Democratic as cries of “Lock him up!” rang out, a reference to the chants about Hillary Clinton used at Trump’s rallies in the run-up to the 2016 presidential elections.

Footage of the incident swept through Twitter, showing the moment that fans inside the stadium changed from cheering to booing.

Adam Longo

@adamlongoTV

President Trump was booed loudly by the fans at Nats Park when he was shown on the big screen.
Then came a loud chant: “Lock him up.” @wusa9

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/oct/27/donald-trump-booed-world-series-lock-him-up-chants-baseball