‘I hate myself’: Dallas cop testifies about night she killed unarmed black man

All the News may be about the impending collapse of Trump.

There are other stories reflecting on the current state of American culture. This murder trial in Dallas is one to which I am paying close attention. It meets at the intersection of Police behavior, black & white relations and women in law enforcement facing the criminal justice system to answer for their actions.

Most disturbing  in this tale is that an innocent black man is dead

The Guardian 9.27.2019

Amber Guyger, who fatally shot Botham Jean in September last year, says: ‘This is not about hate’

Amber Guyger, who is white, was off duty but in uniform when she shot Botham Jean, a 26-year-old native of St Lucia who was black and worked as an accountant in Dallas. (pictured below).

Amber Guyger II 9.27.2019

The Dallas police officer started to cry and shake Friday as she began to testify about the night she killed a neighbor in his own home, which she has said she mistook for her own unit one floor below.

Amber Guyger broke down while recalling approaching her neighbor Botham Jean’s door, leading the judge to call for a brief break so she could compose herself.

Guyger, who is charged with murder in the killing last September, was the first witness that her lawyers called in the high-profile case. She told jurors about how she grew up in a small house in the Dallas suburb of Arlington, how she played in the school band and how she aspired to become a police officer.

“I just wanted to help people, and that was the one career that I thought I could help people in,” said Guyger, who was fired from the police force after the shooting.

Guyger’s testimony marked the first time the public has heard directly from the 31-year-old since Jean’s killing last September.

The basic facts of the unusual shooting are not in dispute. Guyger walked up to Jean’s apartment – which was on the fourth floor, directly above hers on the third – and found the door unlocked. She was off duty but still dressed in her police uniform after a long shift when she shot Jean with her service weapon. Guyger was later arrested, fired and charged with murder.

“I hate that I have to live with this every single day of my life and I ask God for forgiveness, and I hate myself every single day,” Guyger told the packed courtroom.

She said she wished “he was the one with the gun” and had killed her. “I never wanted to take an innocent person’s life. And I’m so sorry. This is not about hate. It’s about being scared that night,” she said.

Guyger’s attorneys say she fired in self-defense after mistaking Jean for a burglar. Her attorneys also say the identical physical appearance of the complex from floor to floor frequently led to tenants parking on the wrong floor or trying to enter the wrong apartment.

Guyger told the jury that when she put her key in what she thought was her apartment door’s lock, the door opened because it hadn’t been fully closed.

Fearing it was a break-in, she drew her service weapon and stepped inside, she said.

Seeing someone inside, Guyger said she said: “Let me see your hands! Let me see your hands.” But she said she couldn’t see the person’s hands and he began coming toward her at a “fast-paced” walk. She said he yelled “Hey, hey, hey!” right before she opened fire.

Guyger told the court she intended to kill him when she pulled the trigger, which she said is what she had been trained to do.

“I was scared he was going to kill me,” she said under questioning by her lawyers, who called her as their first witness.

When prosecutors asked why she didn’t back away and radio for help once she suspected a break-in, Guyger said that entering the apartment “was the only option that went through my head”.

Prosecutors have questioned how Guyger could have missed numerous signs that she was in the wrong place, and suggested she was distracted by sexually explicit phone messages with her police partner. Prosecutors also say Jean was no threat to Guyger, noting that he was in his living room eating a bowl of ice-cream when she entered his apartment.

In a frantic 911 call played in court earlier this week, Guyger says “I thought it was my apartment” nearly 20 times. The shooting attracted intense national scrutiny for the strange circumstances and because it was one in a chain of shootings of unarmed black men by white police officers.

The trial began Monday.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/sep/27/amber-guyger-trial-botham-jean-dallas-officer-apartment

 

Elizabeth Warren tops Democratic candidates in national poll for first time

When the Disgraced criminal buffoon Trump is driven from office there will be a woman with integrity and brains in power.

Breaking News 4.15.2019

The Guardian 9.25.2019

New Quinnipiac survey finds Massachusetts senator polling at 27% with Biden on 25% and Sanders 16%

Elizabeth Warren’s surge to the very top of the Democratic primary field is continuing, after the Massachusetts senator topped a national poll for the first time on Wednesday.

A survey by Quinnipiac found Warren polling at 27% among Democrats and Democratic leaning voters, with Joe Biden on 25%. Bernie Sanders, previously seen as part of a top three of Democratic presidential candidates, had 16%.

With margin of error factored in Warren is essentially tied with Biden, but the poll represents a major boost, coming after a slew of recent surveys in recent days found her leading or tied in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada.

The Quinnipiac poll contained bad news for the California senator Kamala Harris, who was at just 3%, and the New Jersey senator Cory Booker, who was the choice of 0% of Democratic leaning voters. South Bend, Indiana mayor Pete Buttigieg was at 7%.

On Sunday a survey of likely Iowa caucusgoers, carried out by the Des Moines Register, Mediacom and CNN, put Warren at 22% in the state, with Biden at 20%. Sanders had the support of just 11% of respondents, with Buttigieg on 9%.

Two polls released on Tuesday showed Warren also surging in New Hampshire and Nevada. The New Hampshire survey, carried out by Monmouth University, found Warren at 27% in the Granite state, to Biden’s 25%. The margin of error was 4.9%. That survey was a particular blow to Sanders, who was at just 11%, despite winning the New Hampshire primary with 61% of the vote in 2016.

A Suffolk University/USA Today/Reno Gazette-Journal poll in Nevada found Biden at 23% and Warren at 19%.

The release of the Quinnipiac survey comes after Warren announced that she will spend at least $10m on advertising in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina – the first four states to vote in the Democratic primary.

Warren’s national support has increased dramatically since Quinnipiac’s August poll. In that survey Biden had 32% support, with Warren at 19%.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/sep/25/elizabeth-warren-biden-national-poll-democrats-bernie-sanders

Murder in Dallas? Female Cop on Trial. Entered wrong apartment. Shot neighbor

Yet another stranger than fiction tragedy, the result of  Police killing a totally unsuspecting, innocent man in his own apartment.

Wall Street Journal 9.24.2019

DALLAS—The trial of a female white police officer who shot and killed her upstairs black neighbor after accidentally walking into his apartment began with prosecutors saying sexual banter between her and her work partner showed that fatigue wasn’t the problem when she failed to recognize it wasn’t her home.

Amber Guyger’s attorneys called it a tragic accident that she came home tired from a long day of work on Sept. 6 last year, walked into the apartment one floor above her own and mistook its occupant, Botham Jean, for a burglar.

What is undisputed is that Mr. Jean’s door was unlocked and that both were likely confused when she entered his apartment. Mr. Jean, who was watching TV in the dark, stood up and moved toward the door when Ms. Guyger fired two shots, prosecutors said.

He died on his floor as she frantically called 911, repeating to the operator more than a dozen times, “I thought it was my apartment.”

Prosecutors seeking a murder conviction, however, played down the stress and fatigue defense, saying Ms. Guyger —who was later fired from the Dallas police force—was a highly trained officer who had worked a normal day. They suggested she was making plans to meet up for a tryst with her work partner, Martin Rivera, before a conversation with him left her so rattled that she began making bad decisions.

Whether this constitutes murder or a noncriminal accident is expected to center on Ms. Guyger’s mistakes and if they were reasonable.

WSJ Ambery Guyger IV 9.24.2019.jpg

Trial Judge Tammy Kemp (shown above)

Trial Judge Tammy Kemp worked at the Dallas County district attorney’s office twice. Both times she prosecuted family violence cases. The first time was from 1995 to 2000. She left after her mother was diagnosed with terminal cancer and was expected to live only six months. Her mother lived another four and a half years. For a brief time, Kemp did defense work. She returned to the district attorney’s office in 2006 and stayed until she became a judge in 2015.

The shooting has captivated a city with a history of both racial tension—Mr. Jean was black and Ms. Guyger is white—and, in recent years, deadly attacks on police. It has raised questions about reasonable human fear as much as it has inspired horror at the idea of an officer walking in, unprovoked, to kill someone in his own home.

In the wake of the killing, civil rights activists and Dallas’s African-American community protested what they argued was an unjust shooting, while police officers largely rallied to Ms. Guyger’s side.

Family members of both Mr. Jean, who was 26 years old, and Ms. Guyger, 31, were in court Monday, along with reporters and community supporters jostling for entry to the small courtroom. The trial may last as long as two weeks, during which time the jury will be sequestered.

Ms. Guyger was coming off a 13-and-a-half-hour shift, at the end of which she had begun exchanging sexual messages and photos with Mr. Rivera as they discussed meeting up later that night, according to copies of the messages shown to the court.

Prosecutors claimed those and other messages showed she wasn’t particularly tired. Mr. Rivera, however, denied in testimony that he intended to meet Ms. Guyger that night. He said the texts were merely flirting and their sexual relationship had ended months earlier.

Phone records presented in court show that Ms. Guyger called Mr. Rivera while she was driving home and they spoke on the phone for more than 15 minutes. Prosecutors suggested that whatever happened during that phone call altered Ms. Guyger’s mental state, making her fail to notice that she’d parked a floor higher than normal or that Mr. Jean’s apartment had a red door mat and smelled of marijuana.

Defense attorneys contended that it was perfectly understandable, though tragic, that Ms. Guyger absorbed none of those things after a long week that left her so tired she had asked to take the next day off work.

“Everything was behind her and she went on autopilot,” defense attorney Robert Rogers told jurors. “Many of you have done the same thing.”

Mr. Rogers contended that Ms. Guyger was terrified as a large man in what she believed to be her home moved toward her. They said she reacted with reasonable self-defense.

Assistant District Attorney Jason Hermus said the downward trajectory of a bullet fired from a short woman into a tall man meant Mr. Jean had likely been shot just as he was getting up from the couch, before stumbling several steps toward the door. Mr. Rogers called it “preposterous” that Mr. Jean could have moved across the apartment after being shot and said he had likely leaned forward as he was walking toward Ms. Guyger.

The trial continues Tuesday.

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/murder-or-mistake-cop-on-trial-for-shooting-neighbor-in-apartment-mix-up-11569334278?mod=cxrecs_join#cxrecs_s

Shameless McConnell Faults Dems For Taking Whistleblower Complaint Public

Normally I avoid anything Trump on this Blog.  Giving this horrific liar any time just validates his outrageous persona.  There is always an exception.  Mitch McConnell is the most craven, enabler of this awful man.  His unflagging kow towing and lapdog behavior is beyond disgraceful. The Kentucky Senator is a vile, evil person whose conduct as Majority Leader has done more to destroy American democracy than Trump ever imagined would be possible.

Talking Points Memo 9.23.2019

Reports that President Donald Trump repeatedly pressured the president of Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden’s son have roiled Washington for days, after news of an intelligence community whistleblower complaint about the incident surfaced last week.

But on Monday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) suggested he was upset that Democrats were even discussing the complaint publicly.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and House Democrats were the reason the story was front page news, McConnell said.

“I’ve been disappointed to see our colleague, the Democratic leader, choose to politicize the [Senate Intelligence] Committee’s ongoing efforts with respect to a recent whistleblower allegation, the specific subject of which is still unknown,” McConnell said.

The complaint to the intelligence community’s inspector general, Michael Atkinson, is now being blocked from release to Congress by Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire.

McConnell contrasted Democrats’ alarm about the complaint — and Maguire’s handling of it — with the Senate Intelligence Committee, which, he described as working “on a bipartisan basis, in secure settings, out of the public spotlight, to conduct critically important oversight of classified and sensitive matters.”

Mitch McConnell IV TNR 4.11.2019.jpeg

Noting that the committee was working to get Atkinson and Maguire before the committee this week, McConnell suggested Democrats, not Maguire, had broken the rules.

“I believe it’s extremely important that their work be handled in a secure setting, with adequate protections, in a bipartisan fashion,” he said of the intelligence committee, “and based on facts rather than leaks to the press.”

Maguire refused to comply with a House subpoena to hand over the complaint last week. Before that, he wrote to both the House and Senate Intelligence Committees that he was withholding the complaint from Congress, despite the Atkinson’s belief that Congress should see it.

“It is regrettable,” McConnell continued, “that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Schiff and Senator Schumer have chosen to politicize the issue, circumventing the established procedures and protocols that exist so the committees can pursue sensitive matters the appropriate, deliberate, bipartisan manner.”

 

San Francisco voted to provide tenants with lawyers in 2018. Start up is slow.

San Francisco voters passed the measure to provide tenants with legal counsel.  

Nearly 16 months have passed.  The City has provided only a portion of the necessary funding. A bigger problem, as explained to me by a well known and respected tenants attorney, is a lack of “experienced litigators” versed in housing law who can represent tenants.  

The low starting salary of under 60K per year discourages attorneys from applying for a job which requires both professional legal skills along with political smarts in high action San Francisco and its rent control ordinance.

 Finally, explains the attorney, “There is little in terms of support staff in the funding; paralegal, social workers.”  

Excerpted from San Francisco Examiner 9.22.2019

A 2018 measure guaranteeing every San Francisco tenant facing an eviction the right to legal representation is not yet living up to its promise due to funding gaps and a shortage of attorneys able to do the work, the San Francisco Examiner has learned.

Fully funding the Right to Counsel program as quickly as possible is a matter of priorities, according to Prop. F’s author, Dean Preston, the former executive directors of Tenants Together who is a current candidate in the District 5 race for supervisor.

“What I’m hearing from providers is that there is a funding gap that hasn’t been filled and that prevents the full hiring,” Preston told the Examiner on Friday. “At best it’s a matter of priorities. I hope it’s not a political football. I hope there’s a shared commitment to making sure it’s fully implemented.”

In the June 2018 election, 55 percent of San Francisco voters supported Proposition F, or the Right to Counsel program, making San Francisco the second city nationwide to establish a “universal right to counsel” for tenants. An initial $5.8 million was secured to implement the measure, and a city spokesperson confirmed the program has received a total of $9 million so far.

Prop F II  9.22.2019.png

But the 10 service providers who have received funding to provide the expanded legal services report that they are struggling to hire enough attorneys to meet the current demand.

The budget includes funds for a total of 47 new attorneys to be hired by July 1, but only 37 had been hired by that date, according to Cary Gold, director of litigation and policy at the Eviction Defense Collaborative. The organization was selected as the lead partner for the program under the supervision of The City’s Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development.

“[Tenant litigation] isn’t the most popular area of law for lawyers [and] a lot of the organizations are having to hire new attorneys without experience. So even if they have reached their total hiring goals they may not be at full capacity [because the new attorneys need training],” said Gold. “It’s a shaky start.”

But even if all 47 attorney positions had been filled by July 1, the current funding still wouldn’t be enough to provide every tenant eligible for full scope representation with the service, according to Gold.

According to the new law, full-scope representation — meaning representation throughout the eviction proceedings — is triggered 30 days after an eviction notice is served or once an unlawful detainer lawsuit has been filed. The representation is supposed to continue until the notice is withdrawn or the lawsuit is resolved.

Before Prop. F’s passage, only a handful of nonprofit organizations provided pro-bono attorneys for tenants. Some 80 percent of tenants were undergoing eviction proceedings without representation, according to the law’s proponents.

In an effort to describe the demand for legal representation in eviction proceedings, Gold said that EDC has 15 cases “on the settlement conference calendar” on Wednesday, of which seven have full scope attorneys. On Thursday, clients in only six of 11 cases scheduled for a settlement conference have full-scope representation.

According to the law, “they should all have full scope attorneys,” Gold said.

Dustin Helmer, an attorney with the Aids Legal Referral Panel, which is among the organizations now tasked with providing tenants with representation, said that part of the problem is that “there is not enough attention focused on retention.”

“Everyone acknowledges the housing crisis and knows its a problem. The city and tenants want a solution, and there’s a lot of money put into studies about homelessness and finding additional housing, but the people doing the actual work themselves need a bit more support from The City,” said Helmer.

“I expected things to get worse. I didn’t expect The City to have its act together,” he said. “People passed the measure, but how do we implement it? Where do we get the money from? Housing and everything that goes along with it is such a multifaceted issue,” he said.

https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/voters-approved-a-measure-guaranteeing-tenants-representation-but-theres-not-enough-money-to-fulfill-its-promises/

 

 

 

Likely 2020 Nominee Elizabeth Warren. Dem foes have no plan to stop her

Elizabeth Ann Warren will be the 2020 Democrat’s Presidential nominee and she will be elected President in November. I have been writing about the Senator from Massachusetts since the inception of this Blog in late 2018. She is very electable and carries none of the baggage which the White House incumbent shamefully and dishonestly used against Hillary Clinton.  Senator Warren will take Trump to the cleaners.

Wall Street Journal 9.21.2019

While candidates have tangled publicly with Joe Biden, they are being more cautious with the Massachusetts Senator.

WASHINGTON— Elizabeth Warren is building a broad coalition of Democratic voters, and her rivals are taking notice. But so far, they are still testing out ways to undercut her appeal.

Ms. Warren’s steady rise has prompted primary opponents such as Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris and Pete Buttigieg to search for ways to blunt her momentum at a time when the leading contender, Joe Biden, has weathered a series of stumbles and direct attacks.

Senator Warren I 9.21.2019

While candidates have tangled publicly with the former vice president over everything from his age to his agenda, they are being more cautious with Ms. Warren, often criticizing her indirectly or homing in on her policy proposals rather than her record.

“We got a lot of great people running, but some of these ideas are better left in the college faculty lounge than right here at this port,” Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar said during a stop Thursday at a Detroit port.

She said later that she wasn’t singling out the former Harvard Law professor.

Ms. Harris, meanwhile, expressed her frustration about Ms. Warren’s fundraising practices during a private New York fundraiser on Tuesday, people familiar with the event said. Ms. Harris, who hasn’t been so critical of the Massachusetts senator in public, said it was hypocritical for Ms. Warren to claim she wasn’t taking money from large donors when her campaign was using millions transferred from her Senate account and raised before she swore off traditional fundraising.

Powered by large-scale rallies, Ms. Warren has attracted liberals and college-educated women as she seeks to challenge Mr. Biden in the primaries. But a recent Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll showed a boost in enthusiasm for Ms. Warren and detailed support for her among a range of age groups and backgrounds.

That is giving her opponents an incentive to confront her on health care and fundraising with an eye on cracking into her support in Iowa, where she has organized heavily ahead of next February’s leadoff caucuses.

Kristen Orthman, Ms. Warren’s communications director, said, “we will continue to run the campaign we have from the beginning: identifying what is broken, talking about our plans to fix it, and building a grass-roots movement to make it happen.”

The Warren campaign has noted that the senator raised and donated $11 million to help Democrats up and down the ballot around the country while she was running for re-election in 2018.

The large field of Democratic contenders is gathering in Des Moines this weekend for the Polk County Democrats’ steak fry fundraiser, an annual event expected to draw more than 10,000 activists.

Many Democratic campaigns have taken to heart the lessons of 2016, in which several Republican campaigns declined to challenge Donald Trump forcefully until he had built a significant advantage in the primary and then went on to win the party’s nomination and the presidency. Democrats have already tried to pick off Mr. Biden’s support.

A recent Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll showed a boost in enthusiasm for Sen. Elizabeth Warren. 

Now, with Mr. Biden still leading as the fall campaigning picks up, candidates who hope to finish in the top tier in Iowa are looking for new sources of votes.

“In this setup, it is more dangerous to be the No. 2 or No. 3 candidate in the vote total than it is to be 4, 5 or even No. 1,” said Democratic strategist Dan Sena, a former top aide for the House Democrats’ campaign arm.

When Ms. Warren has faced scrutiny, it has largely centered on her support for Mr. Sanders’s Medicare for All plan.

Mr. Biden, during an event Friday in Cedar Rapids, repeated his argument that a single-payer system would be too costly and require higher taxes on middle-class families.

“Tell Elizabeth,” the former vice president told a woman who accused him of protecting the insurance industry and later said she is backing Ms. Warren, “it’s going to cost a lot of money and she’s going to raise people’s taxes doing it, and what are we going to do in the middle of a recession if we end up there?”

Mr. Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Ind., said Ms. Warren is too vague about how she would pay for such a plan.

He said in a Thursday interview with CNN that Ms. Warren “was extremely evasive” when she was asked during the September Democratic debate if the proposal would require taxes to be increased on middle-class families.

“I think that if you are proud of your plan and it’s the right plan, you should defend it,” Mr. Buttigieg said.

Mr. Biden has largely steered clear of Ms. Warren as he sits atop the polls. But both Ms. Warren and Mr. Sanders are looming large over his race.

Neil Bluhm, a billionaire real estate and casino magnate, introduced the former vice president at a Chicago fundraiser on Thursday, telling the audience that Ms. Warren and Mr. Sanders “don’t represent the Democratic Party” that he supports and that Mr. Biden “has the best chance of defeating Trump.”

Senator Warren III 9.21.2019

While Ms. Warren may be gaining momentum, Mr. Sanders is still largely focused on Mr. Biden, with whom he has more clearly defined policy and strategy differences.

Aides to Mr. Sanders have long said they believe that Mr. Biden and Mr. Sanders share a similar section of working-class voters and that one could benefit if the other stumbles.

When asked about Mr. Sanders’s approach to Ms. Warren, senior adviser Jeff Weaver said Mr. Sanders would highlight that he “is the only leading candidate who is running a 100% grass-roots campaign and committed to funding a grass-roots funded general election campaign.”

He also pointed out that Mr. Sanders said during the most recent Democratic debate that he was the only candidate to vote against all of the military budgets in the Trump administration.

Ms. Warren has voted for one of the three, but Mr. Sanders didn’t mention her.

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/democratic-opponents-search-for-a-plan-against-elizabeth-warren-11569067200?mod=hp_lead_pos7&mod=article_inline

Widow of Israeli spy against Netflix series on her husband

I am watching the six part Netflix series, The Spy.  It is definitely well done, absorbs my attention and tense.  I came upon this article which provides a more sobering spin on the Israeli spy planted in Syria during the 1960’s and his ultimate fate.

Arutz Sheva 7.19.2019

Widow of Eli Cohen (pictured above), Israeli spy executed in Syria, attacks Mossad conduct and Netflix series creators for how character is portrayed.

Nadia Cohen, widow of Israeli spy Eli Cohen, launched a fierce attack on senior Mossad officials whom she says continue to bear responsibility for her husband’s death 54 years ago in Syria.

In an interview with Chanan Greenwood in the Shishabbat supplement of Israel Hayom that will be published this Friday, Cohen claims they gave inaccurate information to the creators of The Spy series that this month went streaming on Netflix.

The Spy II 9.19.2019

“A very senior man in the Mossad admitted that Eli was used like they squeeze a lemon. He told me there was no intelligence body in the country – military, civilian, Mossad, GSS, Air Force, Navy – who didn’t want information from him. They exposed him too much.”

She says the head of the Mossad at the time, Meir Amit, sent him back to Syria one last time, even though it was real life-threatening danger, and contrary to Cohen’s own judgement.

“They told him he was in no danger, that they were behind him, and Eli went back to Syria certain that they had betrayed him. The Syrians did the work, but Eli was murdered here in Israel; here they sentenced him to death.”

In 2015, then-head of the Mossad Tamir Pardo admitted that it was a mistake to send Cohen to his last assignment, saying: “To this day, officials at the Mossad continue to lead the line that Eli himself was to blame for being caught, not the fact that serious mistakes were made in the organization’s understanding of the realities on the ground. They’ve betrayed us and lied to us.”

Since Cohen’s public hanging, she has been fighting for the return of his body to Israel, when, among other things, last year she addressed Syrian President Assad with a public request for mercy. Asked if she believes they will return him, she says: “I want to believe. I think the State isn’t doing enough to bring him back.”

Asked if they had forgotten the bereaved family, she replied: “We haven’t got blue eyes. We’ve got no elites behind us. We asked dozens of times the defense ministers, prime ministers and presidents to mention Eli when talking about the prisoners and the missing. But we never heard it.”

Cohen is working to perpetuate his legacy, but says the education system could be doing more: “We try to pass on his legacy. Religious Zionists learn about him, but in the general education system it isn’t enough. There are so many figures in the country that you can admire and grow up on, and Eli is among them.”

Cohen also fiercely attacks the new series created by Gidi Raf (“Abducted” and “Homeland”) for Netflix, in which Sasha Baron Cohen plays the character of Eli Cohen. She says they should have acted in a more educational way.

About the “twisted” way in which the character was portrayed in the series, she said “The last two weeks have brought me back decades, to Eli’s capture, to his hanging. It brings me back to the darkness.”

 

Rampant Racism. U of Wyoming marks 1969 dismissal of 14 black football players

Disgusting rampant Racism. I knew nothing of this horrible, yet typical, 1969  incident of American racism.  The 14 players  wanted to meet with the Coach and discuss wearing black armbands. Why?  The team was scheduled to play Brigham Young University, deep in the heart of Mormon territory.  The players were upset over the racism they experienced during earlier games against BYU. For even bringing up the issue the 14 players were summarily dismissed from the team and lost their scholarships.

Associated Press printed in Chicago Sun Times  9.13.2019

University officials planned to unveil a plaque at War Memorial Stadium commemorating the so-called Black 14. The players were kicked off the Wyoming football team for seeking to wear armbands to protest racism.

LARAMIE, Wyo. — Fifty years after 14 black football players were kicked off the University of Wyoming football team for seeking to wear armbands to protest racism, eight of them returned to the Laramie campus to commemorate the anniversary as the school takes another step toward reconciliation.

University officials unveiled a plaque Friday at War Memorial Stadium commemorating the so-called Black 14. The marker joined an alleyway mural in downtown Laramie that was dedicated last year, and the ceremony capped five days of ceremonies and discussions about the infamous dismissal of all the university’s black players in 1969.

They are now being recognized as leaders in the tradition of protest in sport. It’s a pantheon that includes U.S. track and field athletes Tommie Smith and John Carlos, who raised their fists on a 1968 Olympics medal podium to protest racism and injustice.

Wyoming 14 I 9.18.2019

More recently, former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick accused the NFL of blackballing him for kneeling during the national anthem before games to protest police violence against African Americans.

Protest is appropriate for athletes who want to use their fame and visibility to be heard, Black 14 member Tony Gibson said.

”You can judge them any way you want. But when they’re saying things that matter or are trying to draw your attention to things that might need addressing, I think it’s very important,” Gibson said.

On Oct. 17, 1969, Wyoming head coach Lloyd Eaton summarily dismissed the players and revoked their scholarships after they met with him to propose wearing black armbands during an upcoming game against Brigham Young University.

Eight of the 14 were starters. Eaton’s legacy isn’t confined to the Black 14 episode, Black 14 member John Griffin said.

”He destroyed the Cowboys football team for a decade or so. He is the one who prevented blue-chip players from coming here,” Griffin said. “That was on him, not us.”

The players wanted to protest racism some of them experienced in previous games against BYU and how the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints at the time barred African Americans from the priesthood. Eaton would have none of the idea — and was backed up by the university’s board of trustees and Gov. Stan Hathaway.

They never got a chance to mention the armbands before Eaton lit into them about coming from fatherless families and saying they would only be accepted by traditionally black colleges if they weren’t at the University of Wyoming, they said.

”Our side is coming out. All these years everybody thought we protested and stuff, and we never did,” said Black 14 member Ted Williams.

The healing and reconciliation is not complete for some of the men who came back to campus this week. Some struggled for years after they were labeled as members of the Black 14.

Lionel Grimes said the episode repeatedly came up during job interviews, and he wondered how many job opportunities he missed because of it. The anger has taken years to overcome, he said.

”I was angry about the fact that I had to pay to go to school. I was angry at how the coach had insulted not only me, my fellow teammates, my ancestry,” Grimes said.

Most of all, not being able to learn why Eaton acted as harshly as he did bothers Black 14 members. Eaton could have defused the situation simply by telling the players they couldn’t wear the armbands, Grimes said.

”We would’ve just played football. He never gave us the opportunity to sit down and talk to him,” Grimes said. “We were very respectful then.”

Wyoming had made it to the Sugar Bowl after the 1967 season, losing to LSU 20-13, and went 7-3 in 1968. They were off to a 4-0 start before that day. The now all-white Cowboys went on to beat BYU and San Jose State but lost their last four games.

After Wyoming finished 1-9 in 1970, Eaton was demoted to assistant athletic director. He died in 2007, leaving the Black 14 without an apology or explanation.

”To me, the disappointment, my greatest disappointment, is I never had a clear understanding of his mindset. I never had a clear understanding of what compelled him to act against, as I understood years later, some of the wishes of his coaches,” Black 14 member Guillermo Hysaw said.

Griffin and some of the others have been back to campus over the decades, including for a 1993 event honoring the best players from each previous decade, but until the past several years reception for the Black 14 was lukewarm, Griffin said.

”Now it’s (a) very sincere welcome back: ‘We’re glad to have you back and we’re sorry,’” Griffin said.

https://chicago.suntimes.com/2019/9/13/20864376/wyoming-dismissal-of-black-players-anniversary

 

BiBi Toast?? Cliffhanger in Israel. Arab Parliament members could be deciders

The Trump lapdog Bibi Netanyahu may be on the way out of office and on his way to criminal prosecution.  The American public should take the action in 2020 and send this Clown packing and into criminal indictment.

Excerpted from Deutsche Welle 9.17.2019

Exit polls show Netanyahu’s Likud and the centrist Blue and White in a close tie. Neither party has enough seats with their allies to form a majority, raising the prospect of tough negotiations for a unity government.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared to suffer a setback in national elections Tuesday, with his religious and nationalist allies failing to secure a parliamentary majority, early exit polls showed.

Exit polls from Israel’s three major television stations showed the centrist Blue and White party of ex-military chief Benny Gantz is projected to win 32 seats, while Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud party is on pace for 31 seats.

Arab parties come in third place

The Joint List, an alliance of Arab parties, came in third with 14 seats, according to exit polls. They have suggested they could potentially block Netanyahu from becoming prime minister by recommending Gantz. 

Netanyahu in a late night address to party supporters said that he wanted to assemble a “strong Zionist government and to prevent a dangerous anti-Zionist government” with any Arab parties.

Continuing a campaign theme against Israel’s 20% Arab minority that critics have called racist, he claimed that Arab parties “negate the existence of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state” and “glorify bloodthirsty murderers.”

Israeli election 9.17.2019

Read more: Will election-weary Israelis end Benjamin Netanyahu’s rule?

Israeli exit polls are often imprecise and unofficial results expected on Wednesday could shift the seat count.

Either way, the results indicate that Netanyahu or Gantz will face tough and protracted negotiations to cobble together a government.

The initial results showed that neither Blue and White nor Likud would be able to form a 61 seat majority in the 120 member Knesset with the support of their allies.

Likud and its religious and nationalist allies with which it hoped to form a majority only have 55 seats, less than in April’s election, according to the average of the three exit polls. Blue and White could enlist support of 59 for a center-left government.

Lieberman as kingmaker

The results put ex-Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman in a kingmaker role. His secular, hardline Yisrael Beitenu that receives most of its support from Russian-speakers was on pace to win 9 seats, nearly double its performance in April’s election.

Lieberman, a former Netanyahu protege, refused to join a Likud-led government following April’s election because of what he said was excessive influence ultra-Orthodox religious parties. His move forced Netanyahu to called new elections to avoid giving other parties a chance to form a government.

Late Tuesday, the Moldovan-born Lieberman reiterated that he sought a broad unity government with Likud and Blue and White.

“There is only one option for us,” he said, adding the unity government should exclude the country’s ultra-Orthodox religious parties. 

A complication is that Gantz has ruled out forming a government with a Netanyahu-led Likud at a time when the prime minister is expected to be indicted on corruption charges in the coming weeks. Lawmakers in Gantz’s party have said they are open to a unity government with Likud, but not under Netanyahu’s leadership.

“We will act to form a broad unity government that will express the will of the people,” Gantz said at a post election rally, though he cautioned supporters to wait for final results.

Meanwhile, Lieberman is unlikely to want to sit in a government with left-wing Arab parties or the ultra-Orthodox religious parties. Blue and White is also unlikely to ask Arab parties to join a coalition.

https://www.dw.com/en/israel-election-too-close-to-call-exit-polls/a-50464397

Official Secrets. American Edward Snowden in exile eyes German Asylum

Edward Snowden is off the Radar except for those in law enforcement who seek to imprison him for releasing information which the public has a right to know about, view and debate.

Deutsche Welle 9.16.2019

American whistleblower Edward Snowden has once again expressed interest in seeking political asylum in Germany. He has warned that if he turns up dead, it will not be the result of suicide.

Edward Snowden, a former employee of the US National Security Agency (NSA), said in an interview he would still like political asylum in Germany. “If Germany were to grant me asylum, it would not be viewed as a hostile act toward the United States,” Snowden told Germany’s Die Welt newspaper.

Edward Snowden II 9.16.2019

Snowden criticized Germany and France for not doing anything to support his case so far. “The two countries’ governments were looking for reasons to stop me from coming,” he said. Snowden also reiterated that he didn’t reveal anything that put people’s lives at risk.

Read more: Freedom is acting without asking permission, Edward Snowden tells Berlin

Snowden has previously sought asylum from a number of countries, including Germany, though without success.

The former NSA contractor has been living in exile in Russia for the past six years.

Since he leaked details of secret and extensive US government global surveillance programs in 2013, the US has regarded him as an enemy of the state and slapped him with charges of espionage.

In a separate interview with German news magazine Der Spiegel, he said that if he was found dead it would not be the result of suicide.

“This is important for the record. I am not now, nor have I ever been suicidal. I have a philosophical objection to the idea of suicide, and if I happen to fall out of a window, you can be sure I was pushed.

Snowden’s book, titled “Permanent Record,” is going to be released worldwide on September 17.

 

Until the leaks, the public did not know the extent of the surveillance of the NSA and its British counterpart GCHQ. Snowden’s information led to the wider use of encryption technology and an overhaul of data transfer practices from Europe to the US.

Snowden’s actions in 2013 sparked a huge debate about the extent of government surveillance by intelligence agencies. US officials who conduct annual classified assessments of damage from Snowden’s disclosures say the documents will continue trickling out into the public domain for years to come.

Time for a memoir

Snowden has now written a book about his actions and motivations. Titled “Permanent Record,” it’s going to be released worldwide on September 17.

The book offers by far the most expansive and personal account of how Snowden came to reveal secret details about the government’s mass collection of Americans’ emails, phone calls and Internet activity in the name of national security.

The story traces Snowden’s evolution from childhood, from growing up in the 1980s in North Carolina and suburban Washington, where his mother worked as a clerk at the NSA and his father served in the Coast Guard.

Though the book comes six years after the disclosures, Snowden attempts in his memoir to place his concerns in a contemporary context. He sounds the alarm about what he sees as government efforts worldwide to delegitimize journalism, suppress human rights and support authoritarian movements.

“What is real is being purposely conflated with what is fake, through technologies that are capable of scaling that conflation into unprecedented global confusion,” he says.

https://www.dw.com/en/edward-snowden-still-eying-asylum-in-germany/a-50429478