Pelosi Knows the Art of the Deal. Trump Just Talks About It.

Daily Beast 1.3.2019

Newly sworn-in Speaker Nancy Pelosi may have found a way to tame the savage beast that is Donald Trump. The mother of five knows not to negotiate with an unreasonable child.

“I am in the White House waiting for the Democrats to come on over and make a deal on Border Security,”  Trump tweeted like the reality show host he was not long ago. Pelosi, on vacation with family in Hawaii, hung out a Do Not Disturb sign while the president was forced by the optics of the shutdown he named after himself to forego as much as a  “working” round of golf with his sometime bro Sen. Lindsey Graham. They were reduced to lunch.

Enter the House of Pelosi. Democratic goal: Destroy Donald Trump.

Wall Street Journal Editorial 1.2.2019

GOOD GOOD GOOD – DESTROY DONALD TRUMP

Nancy Pelosi takes the oath as Speaker of the House for the third time Thursday, a suitable reward for gaining 40 seats. If you expect a new era of progress in Washington, however, fair warning. The main Democratic goal will be investigating, not legislating. Then again, the country could do worse than policy gridlock, and it probably will.

The new Democratic House is being compared with the first Pelosi majority of 2006, but there’s one big difference: The 2018 Democrats ran on no discernible agenda beyond rejecting Donald Trump and all his works. The animating purpose of Congress will be investigations to damage, and perhaps impeach, the President to tee up total Democratic control after 2020.

Democrats will also run investigations into payments to Stormy Daniels; the Administration’s policy of separating children at the border; and every consultation with a business about a deregulatory decision. House Democrats will trail every cabinet officer down to whether he ordered a cocktail on a commercial flight. This will present even greater problems in staffing federal agencies.

On policy, Mrs. Pelosi owes her speakership to the left and she will tilt that way. She is already facing a revolt on the left over a rules change to impose pay-as-you-go budgeting. Liberals think it will hamstring their spending plans. That’s fine with us since Paygo, as it’s known, was always more political eyewash than genuine fiscal restraint.

The real House tension will be between the new socialist vanguard and the 30 or so Democrats who won in GOP-leaning districts. It will be instructive to see how many defect from the Green New Deal or Medicare for All if Mrs. Pelosi dares to bring those to the floor.

One certainty is the end of pro-growth legislation. The trend will be toward higher taxes, more regulation and more harassment of business. The new House rules have already cashiered “dynamic scoring” that forced the Congressional Budget Office to think about how a proposal affects the economy. Dynamic scoring isn’t some GOP effort to prove taxes “pay for themselves” but a tool that informs lawmakers of economic costs and trade-offs and can improve policy.

The GOP Senate, with a new majority of 53, should be able to check the left’s impulses to jack up the corporate tax rate or restore the federal deduction on all state and local taxes. Mrs. Pelosi will try to lure Mr. Trump into a deal on infrastructure or drug prices. But Mr. Trump will be less likely to go along if he has to rely on the GOP to fend off impeachment.

It’d be nice to think there’s a chance at cooperation on immigration, but it’s unlikely as long as Democrats think the issue gives them an edge in elections. It’s clear from the shutdown over “border security” that Democrats think they have the edge on immigration, even if collateral damage could be the young adult “Dreamers” who need legal clarity to stay in the country.

The best test of Mrs. Pelosi’s deal-making sincerity will be what she does on Mr. Trump’s new Nafta deal. The President went a long way in negotiations to appease unions, with Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown as Big Labor’s whisperer, but the President still doesn’t have the votes. When she took the gavel in 2007, Mrs. Pelosi stuck George Bush’s pending trade deals in a drawer.

All of this will unfold along with the fight for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, which will reinforce the party’s anti-Trump fervor. Voters may think they sent Democrats to Washington to “check” Mr. Trump’s unpresidential habits. Americans may soon discover that they’ve invested those hopes in more polarization and vitriol.

Hostage Negotiator’s Lesson in Listening

‘In a volatile situation where someone’s life is on the line, there can be no shortcuts.’

Wall Street Journal – Masada Siegel 1.1.2019

Is listening a lost art? On TV news and talk shows, everyone seems to be interrupting one another. Likewise in the political arena. Listening is especially rare on social media, where people are eager to talk and loath to hear other points of view.

So recently I challenged myself to talk less and instead to actively listen, ask more questions, and think about the responses. In particular, everywhere I went I asked people if they feel listened to and if they listen to others.

At a media conference, one lady told me sometimes she gets nervous around new people, so she thinks about what she will say as she listens so that she can be part of the conversation. Another said that she wished people would listen and not respond with a solution, because sometimes she’s only looking for a sounding board.

One evening at a restaurant, I struck up a conversation with a couple and asked their opinion. They both said they weren’t good listeners and frequently interrupt people because they want to participate in conversations. “I talk a lot because I’m insecure and want people to like me,” the husband acknowledged. “Ironically, I’m reading lots of leadership books, which all say if you want people to like you, you need to be a better listener.”

Glenn Cohen, who recently retired as chief psychologist and hostage negotiator for the Israel Defense Forces, told me that listening can mean life or death in his line of work. There are five steps to negotiating a hostage’s release, he said; the first one is listening to the terrorist.

“The biggest mistake to make is to jump to the last step, which is behavioral change,” he said. “In a volatile situation where someone’s life is on the line, there can be no shortcuts. You must listen, as the hostage taker is all charged up, emotionally and physically.

“He has his goal, so you must hear him out and understand what he wants to accomplish,” Mr. Cohen said. “As a negotiator, you are looking for a win-win situation, and a hostage taker needs an opportunity to vent and let off steam, as their adrenaline is pumping and as they are in the moment. Unless they unload their demands, they don’t have the capacity to hear and consider behavior change.”

Listening is an influential skill. The more you give others space to talk, the better you understand them and the more willing they are to listen themselves.

Ms. Siegel is a freelance journalist who covers international affairs, business and travel.

“Troubadour for the Populist Left”

My Response to 2019 New Year’s Day Wall Street Journal Editorial

It is reassuring there is some consistency as the 2019 begins. The WSJ inveighs against Senator Warren with a typically snark laden editorial; “Troubadour for the populist left,” and the Commentariat makes for the usual Fox News chorus.  It’s regrettable that someone of Senator Warren’s intelligence, integrity and acumen is discounted in such a casual manner. But, as I have written before, Amerika got what it deserves with Trump. Sadly, the majority of the country continues to live with the Trumpian train wreck.

Elizabeth Warren: Run against Trump: ‘I’m in this fight’

My wife’s maiden name is Elizabeth Ann Warren.  Both women are battlers.

Trump needs to be brought down by a Woman.

Senator Warren, who has fought for consumer protection, describes herself as a defender of the ordinary American against the interests of the wealthy and powerful.

Ms. Warren, 69 years old, an Oklahoma-born former Harvard Law School professor with a specialty in bankruptcy law, saw her national political stature rise following the 2008 financial crisis. She was the architect of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and was President Obama’s first choice to lead it before her nomination was blocked by Senate Republicans.

How Nancy Pelosi signaled the end of Donald Trump’s easy ride

 Photo of the Month

Excerpted from the Guardian of London – 12.30.2018

Nancy Pelosi was perched on the end of a sofa in the Oval Office when the balance of power in Donald Trump’s Washington decisively shifted in her favour.

 

Babylon Berlin

Watching this Series on Netflix in German with Subtitles. European drama is often so much more involved politically and culturally.

Excerpted from Deutsche Welle 10.16.2017

It’s a declaration of love to the exalted lifestyle of Berlin of the 1920s. Director Tom Tykwer, who has already worked on historical films such as “Perfume: The Story of a Murderer” (2006), felt strongly about this: “The story is set in a city going through a cultural explosion, an abrupt decline of moral standards and complete upheaval. Back then, different artists from all over came together, and simply came up with something radically new.”

The TV series “Babylon Berlin” features all the well-documented excesses of the Weimar Republic: wild dance scenes, bitter poverty and glamorous wealth, explicit sex scenes in nightclubs and the noisy threat of violence by the up-and-coming Nazis.

Filmmaker Tom Tykwer was joined by colleagues Achim von Borries and Hendrik Handloegten to direct the series, which has two seasons, and a total of 16 episodes. Together, they developed the screenplay, as well as the series’ cleverly interwoven story lines. “Babylon Berlin” is the most costly TV series ever produced in Germany, and one of the best.

Gereon Rath, a young detective from Cologne who has been ordered to Berlin on a secret mission, is also shocked by the night life in the capital — but he is soon infected by the city’s pulsating energy. As if sucked into a massive maelstrom, he plunges into the realm of the criminals who cross his path, fascinated by the world of nightclubs and vaudeville hows.

The poverty of the proletariat, the luxuries of the wealthy – these conflicting worlds clash in the TV series.

 

Cabaret-era Berlin in times of rising populism. German Weimar Republic

Excerpted from Deutsche Welle 12.28.2018

Buchcover Goodbye to Berlin von Christopher Isherwood (Random House )

Christopher Isherwood’s 1939 novel was described by George Orwell as “brilliant sketches of a society in decay.

There was a less glamorous, more dramatic side to Berlin in the 1920s. The fragility of the German democracy after the First World War resulted in a political context where instability and violence became a new normality, leading to the well-known eventual rise of the Nazis.

Moreover, the economic conditions were terrible. Even Isherwood was aware of this: the sexual liberation of the time was much more about people being unemployed and having nothing else to sell but their bodies. Prostitution, both homosexual and heterosexual, and often practiced by minors, is indeed another feature of the period.

Isherwood moved to Berlin in 1929, at the age of 25. What he saw here, together with the people he met, inspired some of his best-known fiction works, as well as an important part of his autobiographical writing. His literary approach was that of an observer, a foreign witness of the time. “I am a camera,” he wrote in Goodbye to Berlin.

In 1966, Broadway also gave birth to a musical adaption of Serwhood’s novel: Cabaret. The hit production depicting nightlife at the seedy Kit Kat Klub went on to inspire the 1972 Oscar-winning film starring Liza Minnelli (top picture).

That audience was fascinated by the spirit of the German capital then, or better said, by Isherwood’s accounts of it. Berlin was not just another city in Europe. The Weimar Republic “was a time of anxiety, but also a time for hedonism, sexual liberties and artistic experimentation.”

Weimar Berlin was indeed known to be a place that broke the social conventions of its epoch. Many women questioned gender roles and some of them defied patriarchal traditions by becoming economically independent from men. The cabaret environment also created room for sexual minorities to express themselves in a relatively freer way. Many gay and lesbian-targeted establishments opened and survived during those years, even though sexual intercourse between males was criminalized under Paragraph 175.

Before Nazism put an end to this oasis of modernity, Isherwood was seduced by this city and its creatures, which he immortalized in his books.

In fact, the public interest Weimar Berlin is growing thanks to different cultural works set in the city during that politically turbulent and socially transgressor period.

A popular TV series, Babylinon Berlin, was later produced based on these works. Its two first seasons were picked up by Netflix, bringing Weimar into living rooms all over the world.

Bundeskunsthalle | Ausstellung Kino der Moderne - Film in der Weimarer Republik (Deutsche Kinemathek/Horst von Harbou)

A current exhibition at the Bundeskunsthalle in Bonn also revisits the cinema of the Weimar Republic. Shown here: a still from Fritz Lang’s “Metropolis”

German woman files assault complaint: Bad haircut

A Little Light News to Cut Through the Usual Daily Events

Deutsche Welle 12.27.2018

A woman has filed a police complaint alleging she was assaulted by a hairstylist after her hair was cut too short, DPA news agency reported.

The 34-year-old woman went to a hair salon in Wittenberge in Brandenburg State and showed the stylist a picture of her desired hair cut.

Read more: Man pepper sprays hairdresser after bad haircut

According to the customer, her hair was cut much shorter than she had requested.

The hairdresser then tried to correct the mistake with hair extensions.

After the procedure, the customer then complained of a headache and filed a police complaint.

The case is being investigated, a police spokesperson said.

GOPer Defends Free Press, Says Trump ‘Hitler-Like Character’

My thoughts Exactly

Excerpted from TPM – 12.26.2018

Outgoing Republican Rep. Mark Sanford (R-SC) on Wednesday warned of the dangers of accepting the term “fake news” and suggested that Trump’s presidency could eventually lead to the emergence of a “Hitler-like character.”

“I want to be clear and explicit that I am not likening Trump to Hitler, but the forces at play could lead to a future Hitler-like character if we don’t watch out.”