What Warhol Saw When He Looked at Women

The New York City art scene. An Andy Warhol Exhibit opens at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (MOMA) in May 2019

Wall Street Journal 4.23.2019

Following a massive retrospective at the Whitney, Dominique LĂ©vy and Brett Gorvy have organized the show ‘Warhol Women’ at their Upper East Side gallery, opening April 25

Dominique LĂ©vy went to From A to B and Back Again, the Whitney Museum of American Art’s Andy Warhol retrospective, at least ten times when it was on earlier this year. “You [went] tired, anxious or on a bad day, and you came out with an energy that’s almost vibrating,” says LĂ©vy, the co-founder of LĂ©vy Gorvy gallery. She and her co-founder Brett Gorvy think the Whitney show has opened a door to zoom in even more closely on Warhol. On April 25, their show Warhol Women opens at the gallery’s Upper East Side space, exploring the artist’s relationship to women, femininity and beauty through his silkscreen portraits from the early 1960s through the ’80s.

Warhol Women III 4.23.2019

Gorvy and LĂ©vy think the show will energize collectors—the Warhol market moves in waves, Gorvy says, and the Whitney show created the “next big one.” They’re also excited to bring in the broader public and the many artists who have been influenced by Warhol. “He has this capacity of being the father figure to pretty much all the younger artists that are working today,” says Gorvy. “Him representing women as a male artist is a very interesting idea. This is someone who thought he was ugly as hell and changed his whole image to hide [that]. He identified with femininity.”

Gorvy and LĂ©vy have arranged the show so that the first works viewers see are portraits of Jackie Onassis and Marilyn Monroe, facing one another. LĂ©vy, who came up with the show’s concept, says that no other man has been able to look at women the way Warhol did. “Without sexualizing the subject, he was able to do these portraits where the woman is allowed to be who she is,” she says. “He captures the openness, the self-consciousness, the self-assurance, the insecurity. Aren’t we all self-conscious? I think nobody [else] does that, and that’s where he becomes conceptual.” In Warhol’s depiction of Monroe, LĂ©vy says, he “sees the enormous sadness” that she felt.

Warhol’s understanding of women evolved over several decades, according to LĂ©vy. As the women’s rights movement took off in the 1960s, he was “purely an artist” portraying women. “The ’70s and ’80s are a very different story. By then, he’s much more aware of the discussion of feminism,” she says. Warhol’s concept of beauty wasn’t “stereotypical,” she adds. “I think he found Gertrude Stein and Golda Meir beautiful.” Their portraits are featured in the show, along with silkscreens of Aretha Franklin, Brigitte Bardot, Dolly Parton, Warhol’s mother Julia Warhola, and many others.

Warhol Women 4.23.2019

The show spans three floors of the gallery’s airy Upper East Side space, including its vestibule on 73rd Street. The whole room has been covered in foil, in the way of Warhol’s Factory, and a screen shows some of his famous three-minute screen tests with subjects like Edie Sedgwick and Susan Sontag. On Wednesdays from 1:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. and Saturdays from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., gallery-goers can also create their own 90-second screen tests, which they can easily post to—where else?—Instagram.

Famed daredevil skateboarder killed by dump truck in deadly San Francisco

The rapid mass urbanization of San Francisco is making it increasingly dangerous for the citizenry to safely navigate. This is a price San Francisco will pay for permitting unchecked urban sprawl to run rampant.

Excerpted from San Francisco Chronicle 4.23.2019

Pablo Ramirez was living his dream in San Francisco. The native of New York came to the city with his skateboard and made a name for himself as one of the fastest skaters on the famously steep hills. His stunts were death-defying.

That all ended in tragedy on Tuesday when the 26-year-old was fatally struck by a dump truck while skateboarding up Seventh Street in the city’s South of Market neighborhood. Witnesses said Ramirez was hanging onto the back of a moving vehicle and being towed just moments before he was killed, police said.

pablo-ramirez-4.23.2019.jpg

Ramirez’s death marks the 11th person to be killed by a vehicle this year in San Francisco. Seven pedestrians, including Ramirez, one bicyclist and three people in vehicles have been killed, police said.

Investigators were speaking with witnesses and gathering security video as they worked to determine what happened in the moments before the fatal collision. The truck driver remained at the scene and was cooperating with investigators. Police do not suspect drugs or alcohol were factors in the wreck.

The truck had markings reading UPC Hauling, a South San Francisco company that dissolved in 2018, according to records. Attempts to reach the truck’s registered owner were unsuccessful.

Ramirez, known on Instagram as “Psplifff,” posted his last skateboard video four days ago. On Tuesday the comment section — he had nearly 30,000 followers — was full of tributes. One called him “King of your time.” Another read, “Ride on brother, you will always be one of the fastest to ever do it.”

Ramirez, who was also a DJ and painter, previously traveled to Russia with a group from Thrasher. Last summer he went to the Dominican Republic, where his family was originally from. He posted videos of his time there.

Tess Rothstein 3.19.2019

Tuesday’s deadly accident happened a little more than a block from where a truck crushed bicyclist Tess Rothstein last month. A driver opened her door into the bike lane at Sixth and Howard streets, prompting the 30-year-old Rothstein to swerve into the truck.

Israeli court. Evict illegal Israeli settlers from Palestinian-owned home

This is news you rarely read in American media

Ma’an News Agency 4.22.2019

HEBRON (Ma’an) — An Israeli court ordered the eviction of Israeli settlers from a Palestinian-owned home that they held illegally since 2005 in Hebron City, in the southern occupied West Bank district of Hebron, on Monday.

Hebrew-language news outlets reported that the Jerusalem Magistrate Court rejected claims by Israeli settlers, stating that given their “long occupation” of the property and their investments to improve it, the home should remain theirs. 
The court rejected the claims and ordered the Israeli settlers to pay the Palestinian family 580,000 shekels ($161,000) as compensation for the years it was held illegally by the settlers.
Palestine Settlements II 4.22.2019
The legal owners, the Bakri family, were represented by attorney, Samer Shehadeh, who confirmed that the Israeli settlers were appealing the court ruling.
The home is located in the Tel Rumeida neighborhood, in the center of Hebron City, and sits on 0.75 acres of land.
Palestinian residents in Hebron said that Tal Construction & Investments LTD., the company which bought the home based on forged documents, is registered as a Jordanian company, however, is operated by Israeli settlers who aim to promote illegal settlements across the occupied West Bank.
Tal Construction bought the Hebron home in 2005 from Hani al-Batash, who claimed to have legal rights over the property, for $300,000 and handed it over to Israeli families.
Nevertheless, Israeli police launched an investigation into the issue and determined that the documents used during the transaction were forged and that al-Batash was not the legal owner of the property.
The area of Tel Rumeida has long been a flash-point for tensions between Palestinians and Israeli settlers and military, as it is located near illegal Israeli settlements whose residents are notoriously aggressive toward Palestinians.
Tel Rumeida is located within the area of the city designated as H2, an area taking over the bulk of Hebron’s Old City that is under full Israeli military control, and the site of five illegal Israeli settlements which continually expand into surrounding Palestinian neighborhoods.
The Israeli-controlled H2 area is home to 30,000 Palestinians and around 800 Israeli settlers who live under the protection of Israeli forces.Some 800 notoriously aggressive Israeli settlers now live under the protection of the Israeli military in the Old City of Hebron, surrounded by more than 30,000 Palestinians.

http://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?id=783294

Launched in 2005, Ma’an News Agency (MNA) publishes news around the clock in Arabic and English, and is among the most browsed websites in the Palestinian territories, with over 3 million visits per month. Considered the main source of independent news from Palestine, MNA has become the first choice for online information for many Palestinians, and is also attracting a growing international readership and interest from prominent international news organizations and agencies.

Ma’an Network is the largest independent TV, radio and online media group in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. It also broadcasts regionally via the Ma’an-Mix satellite channel.

Swastikas permitted in America. Germany bans horrid Nazi symbols

Easter Sunday 4.21.2018

America needs laws prohibiting the display of any Nazi insignia or paraphernalia as shown in the above.  Regrettably. since this country selected a shameless President whose politics display a fascist mentality, these abhorrent symbols will continue to flourish.

Excerpted from Deutsche Welle 8.14.2018

Illegally displaying Nazi symbols in Germany can be punished by three years in jail. The ban broadly exempts art, but which works are allowed to show swastikas, SS sig runes and such is often more a matter of the medium.

Swastika I 4.21.2019

A fine or up to three years in prison under the Criminal Code. Demagoguery — the incitement of hatred against people of a certain race or religion — can even be punished with up to five years in jail in Germany. This also includes denying the Holocaust.

Displaying Nazi emblems in Germany is, naturally, complicated, even without the Entertainment Software Self-Regulation Body  (USK) guidelines.

In Germany, the law considers swastikas and SS sig runes the “symbols of anti-constitutional organizations.” Displaying them publicly or selling goods that sport them is illegal. The Nazi salute and statements such as “Heil Hitler” are also banned in public.

Swastikas and other banned symbols can, however, be displayed in Germany if they are used for “civic education, countering anti-constitutional activities, art and science, research and education, the coverage of historic and current events, or similar purposes,” according to the Criminal Code.

That means that movies and TV shows — Quentin Tarantino’s Inglourious Basterds  (Photo below) and Amazon’s The Man in the High Castle, among them — are usually allowed to be distributed in Germany even if they feature swastikas and other Nazi symbols.

Swastika II 4.21.2019

Posting a picture with a swastika in it or Nazi slogans on social media is illegal in Germany. In March 2018, a 45-year-old man was sentenced to three months in prison after he repeatedly posted pictures of a masked man with tattoos of a swastika and other Nazi symbols on Facebook. 

Exceptions also apply to social media, however. When heute-show, a weekly satirical news program, posted a picture of a swastika-shaped Schnitzel on Facebook along with a joke about the Austrian election in April 2016, state prosecutors did not take up the case —  arguing that the swastika was used to illustrate a swing to the right in the Austrian election in an “exaggerated form” and that the post did not constitute an endorsement of an anti-constitutional organization.

Though displaying anti-constitutional symbols publicly is illegal, people in Germany are allowed to own goods branded with the swastika, SS sig runes and other anti-constitutional symbols as long as they make sure that only a limited number of people can see them. It’s legal to have a cellar full of Nazi memorabilia; displaying a flag visible to passersby through a window is deemed legal by some experts and illegal by others.

Hardy_A_IC2

American Nazis parade – 1937

Selling goods with Nazi symbols is generally banned, but there are exceptions for artifacts if the dealer covers up the anti-constitutional symbols when displaying them publicly. So, it’s perfectly legal to sell an SS helmet at a flea market if the sig rune has been covered with tape. It is, however, only legal to deal with antiques that were produced up until 1945: Selling relica Nazi military uniforms, for example, is not.

In cases of controversy, it is usually up to courts to rule on whether the use of a Nazi symbol has educational, scientific, journalistic or artistic merit.

https://www.dw.com/en/germanys-confusing-rules-on-swastikas-and-nazi-symbols/a-45063547

 

Trump tampered with witnesses. Senate GOP voted to oust Clinton for doing that

The Guardian has a fascinating piece putting into sharp focus the total hypocrisy and disgusting behavior of the craven and spineless Republicans in Congress

Excerpted from The Guardian 4.20.2019

Robert Mueller’s report effectively accused Donald Trump of obstructing justice by witness tampering, one of the offences that led Republicans to impeach Bill Clinton 20 years ago.

Mueller’s team found Trump repeatedly made efforts to “encourage witnesses not to cooperate with the investigation” into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, the special counsel’s final report said.

trump-the-dictator-1.26.2019-e1555823920180.jpg

In both these cases, Mueller found evidence that Trump acted with the intent of hindering the investigation – a necessary component for prosecuting witness tampering and obstruction of justice generally.

In addition, Mueller found that Trump asked senior advisers to tell Michael Flynn, his former national security adviser, to “stay strong”, and asked for two senior White House officials who were witnesses in the investigation to create fake records that would help protect him.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/apr/20/mueller-report-impeachment-obstruction-bill-clinton-republicans

 

SF police ripped by Supervisors. Scandalous. Leaked Adachi report

San Francisco Police Department officials are being justifiably ripped for the unconscionable leak of an SFPD report shortly after Jeff Adachi’s (shown above) sudden and untimely death on February 22, 2019. This police misconduct needs to be punished.

Excerpted from San Francisco Chronicle 4.19.2019
“Information our office obtained suggests very strongly that the SFPD report in Jeff’s case was sold to the media,” said Matt Gonzalez, chief attorney in the public defender’s office. “If true, it represents a significant lapse in ethics and it betrays the public trust. That this happened in a matter involving an elected official who sometimes battled the police only further troubles us.”matt-gonzalez-and-mano-raju-mission-local-3.11.2019.jpg

Photo above: Matt Gonzalez with new Public Defender Manohar Raju 3.11.2019

San Francisco supervisors castigated the city’s Police Department Thursday over a pair of recent stumbles in which sensitive private information — including an incident report related to the death of former Public Defender Jeff Adachi, a vocal police critic — was improperly released to the public.

Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer first called for the hearing following the improper release of a confidential police report documenting Adachi’s death that was obtained by multiple news outlets, including The Chronicle, in the days after he was pronounced dead. Adachi’s widow, Mutsuko Adachi, attended the hearing and called the police department’s actions “despicable.”

Remarks from  deputy public defender Matt Gonzalez at the Government Audit and Oversight Committee meeting also suggested that a copy of the leaked report had been shopped to media outlets for $2,500. Investigations into the improper release of the report are ongoing.

Police Commander Greg McEachern said the Adachi family deserved an apology, “and I’m offering that today.” Adachi died Feb. 22.

https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/SF-police-get-an-earful-about-leaked-Adachi-from-13779379.php?psid=6nO7#photo-16973715

Horse takes daily stroll through Frankfurt — without owner

How nice to be in a place where there is some tranquility.

Every Picture Tells a Story – Ongoing Series

Deutsche Welle 4.18.2019

Every morning in Frankfurt’s Fechenheim district, an Arabian mare named Jenny takes a leisurely stroll through the streets by herself. But she has to wear a card that reads: “I’m called Jenny, not a runaway, just taking a walk. Thanks.”

For more than a decade, police have had to tell worried pedestrians calling in that Jenny is known throughout the neighborhood and that she does not present a danger, local media reported this week.

“The police know. When someone calls in, the police ask me: ‘Werner, do you know where Jenny is?’ Yes, I say. ‘Ok, then everything is in order,'” Jenny’s owner, Werner Weischedel, told “Maintower,” a news show.

“We’ve never had to do anything before,” police spokeswoman Isabell Neumann told German news agency dpa.

Frankfurt Horse II 4.17.2019

https://www.dw.com/en/horse-takes-daily-stroll-through-frankfurt-without-owner/a-47833431

Democrats subpoena Trump lender Deutsche Bank. Demand a response.

Trump is in hock to this major German bank.  Will he be able to intimidate Deutsche Bank into ignoring the subpoena?  Stay tuned. 

Excerpted from Deutsche Welle 4.15.2019

Deutsche Bank and several other banking institutions were subpoenaed on Monday by two US House of Representatives committees investigating President Donald Trump’s finances.

The House’s Intelligence and Financial Services committees issued subpoenas to the German lender — as well as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup — seeking information about Trump’s business dealings and possible Russian money laundering.

“The potential use of the US financial system for illicit purposes is a very serious concern. The Financial Services Committee is exploring these matters, including as they may involve the president and his associates, as thoroughly as possible,” Financial Services Committee chair Maxine Waters (picture above) said in a statement.

Deutsche Bank 4.17.2019

https://www.dw.com/en/democrats-subpoena-deutsche-bank-over-trumps-finances/a-4834366

Woman Arrested at Mar-a-Lago. Had Cache of Electronics. Deemed flight risk

The Wall Street Journal and its scandal sheet style reporting.  A story better suited for The New York Post.  Reads like a made for TV docudrama.  It’s all here.  Espionage, Prostitution and China.  Wow!!!

Wall Street Journal  – 4.15.2019

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla.—A federal judge ordered that a Chinese woman arrested for entering President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort without authorization be held in jail while she awaits trial.

Yujing Zhang, 33 years old, had a cache of electronics when she was detained, including a device that can detect hidden cameras, four cellphones and nine USB drives, according to prosecutors.

A federal grand jury indicted her on Friday for making false statements, which carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison, and unlawfully entering a restricted building or grounds, which is punishable by up to a year in prison.

U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman denied Ms. Zhang bond at a detention hearing Monday, saying that there was a serious risk she would flee ahead of trial or not show up for it, as prosecutors argued. He said he found it suspicious that Ms. Zhang had so much electronic equipment and cash, and found inconsistencies in her statements to authorities troubling.

“It does appear to the court that Ms. Zhang was up to something nefarious,” Judge Matthewman said.

Ms. Zhang also was arraigned at Monday’s hearing, and her attorneys entered a not guilty plea on her behalf.

The case has focused scrutiny on potential security vulnerabilities at Mar-a-Lago and efforts by foreign and domestic parties to bypass regular protocols in seeking access to Mr. Trump and his advisers.

When Ms. Zhang arrived at Mar-a-Lago on March 30, she first told a U.S. Secret Service agent that she was there to visit the pool. She was allowed to enter, likely as a result of confusion over whether she was a relative of a club member with the same last name, according to a criminal complaint.

Yujing Zhang II 4.16.2019.jpeg

At a second checkpoint, Ms. Zhang told a receptionist she was there to attend a “United Nations Friendship Event,” which didn’t exist, according to the indictment. “As the defendant then and there well knew, no such event was scheduled at Mar-a-Lago and its grounds,” the indictment said.

Kristy Militello, an assistant federal public defender representing Ms. Zhang, said her client went to Mar-a-Lago to attend what she believed was a networking event. The attorney submitted evidence that Ms. Zhang paid the equivalent of about $20,000 to one of the event’s promoters, Chinese businessman Charles Lee.

Mr. Lee has ties to Cindy Yang, the former owner of a day spa where police say they recently videotaped male customers paying for sexual services; among those charged in late February with soliciting prostitution was New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft.

Ms. Militello argued that Ms. Zhang followed proper procedures when she arrived at Mar-a-Lago, presenting herself at the main entrance and showing two Chinese passports. The attorney argued that Ms. Zhang wasn’t facing charges of espionage and that she had “every incentive to appear for court” to clear her name. She asked the judge to allow Ms. Zhang to be released on a $250,000 bond.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Rolando Garcia argued that Ms. Zhang presented a serious risk of flight and urged the judge to keep her in detention. He said a preliminary analysis of text messages on Ms. Zhang’s cellphones showed that she was notified on March 26, four days before the event she was scheduled to attend, that it had been canceled.

Mr. Garcia also provided an update on an analysis of a thumb drive Ms. Zhang had that prosecutors initially said contained malware. Upon further examination, he said, that finding could be a “false positive,” though additional analysis is needed.

Judge Matthewman said he found numerous aspects of Ms. Zhang’s case concerning, including that she came in close proximity to computers at Mar-a-Lago while carrying several electronic devices. The judge also cited the evidence that Ms. Zhang apparently knew the Mar-a-Lago event was canceled before she traveled to the U.S. from China.

“The weight of the evidence against Ms. Zhang is quite strong,” Judge Matthewman said