FBI and local cops raid home. Terrorize journalist. Probe leaked Adachi report

It is all well and good to determine who in the SFPD is responsible for the scandalous leak of a confidential police report  about the death of  the late Public Defender Jeff Adachi. Tactics used by the FBI and SFPD are reminiscent of Gestapo Police State tactics. The cops, under the guise of good police work, are engaging in totally abusive and unwarranted tactics. Jeff Adachi would not have approved of such totalitarian action.

San Francisco Examiner 5.10.2019

FBI agents and San Francisco police raided the home and office of a freelance journalist Friday morning as part of an ongoing investigation into a leaked confidential police report containing salacious details about the death of late Public Defender Jeff Adachi.

Freelancer Bryan Carmody said that police and FBI agents attempted to enter his home at 8:30 a.m. using “a sledgehammer.”

Journalist raid 5.10.2019

“They were in the process of breaking my gate down at which time I woke up and let them in,” said Carmody, adding that the authorities entered his home with guns drawn and searched “my entire house from attic to garage.”

Carmody said that he was detained in handcuffs for more than seven hours and asked to be released several times, but that authorities refused his request. He said he remained in handcuffs as police brought him along with them to his Western Addition office, where they found the police report in a safe.

Carmody accused police of “intimidation” to “make me break my [journalistic] ethics.”

“I’m refusing to give up my source,” he said.

Carmody told the San Francisco Examiner that his home and office were raided by police and FBI agents because he had obtained a copy of the police report, and sold information from that report to the press following Adachi’s death on February 22.

The leak drew wide condemnation and prompted members of the Board of Supervisors to call for the police department to investigate and hold accountable the source of it within the department.

Two weeks prior, Carmody said that he was interviewed by police officers about where he obtained his information, but refused to disclose his source. Today, Carmody said that police and FBI agents executed a search warrant on his Richmond District home and Western Addition office.

They confiscated his cell phones, computers and a copy of the police report from within his office safe.

“They have completely shut down my business,” said Carmody, who has operated as an independent stringer for Bay Area and national television stations, including Fox News, CNBC and CBS Evening news.

A San Francisco Police Department spokesperson confirmed Friday that the raid “is part of an ongoing criminal investigation regarding the Adachi police report.”

Carmody doesn’t believe that whatever materials were confiscated would lead to identifying the source of the leaked report.

Carmody said he sold details of the reports as a story package that included “video information” and “off-the record interviews” as “any freelance journalist does.” He said that the package was bought by three media outlets. He would not disclose which outlets.

Friends and supporters of Adachi, who dedicated his career to uncovering police misconduct, said the leak was political retribution. Carmody declined to comment on the motivation of the leak.

At an April hearing it was revealed that a freelance reporter had allegedly sold the information to media outlets for $2,500 each, but his identity was not disclosed.

Public Defender Mano Raju, who succeeded Adachi, said in an email statement that he is “pleased that [Police Chief Bill Scott] and others are keeping their word and working to get to the bottom of it.”

“All of our criminal justice and City Hall leaders agree that the release of police reports in this fashion is wrong,” said Raju.

https://www.sfexaminer.com/the-city/san-francisco-police-raid-home-of-journalist-to-find-leak-in-adachi-death/

Cycle on!!! San Francisco to ‘double’ bike lanes. Protect cyclists. Enforce laws.

San Francisco is showing itself, finally, to be a true Bicycle friendly place and put itself right up there with major European cities where cycling is a an integral part of the urban environment. I have been cycling in this City since 1972. I do not own a car and am ecstatic that this progressive action is taking place. San Francisco is one place where motorists will not dominate the transportation grid.

Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez – San Francisco Examiner 5.9.2019

People who ride bicycles may be popping wheelies after Mayor London Breed’s Thursday announcement:

More bike lanes are coming to San Francisco, at “double” the pace of original plans.

Breed is tasking The City’s transit agency to build out 20 miles of protected bike lanes in just two years.

And in a boon to frustrated cyclists, Breed asked city agencies to increase citations of bike lane-blocking drivers by 10 percent.

bike lanes II 5.9.2019.jpg

That means more tickets for drivers who swing into green lanes, a problem many have publicly said is caused by two types of drivers: Uber and Lyft drivers trying to pick up passengers, and those in trucks delivering goods at nearby businesses.

“Since 2006, bicycling in San Francisco has almost tripled,” Breed said in a statement Thursday. “As our city continues to grow, we know we need more protected bike lanes, not only to keep people safe but also to encourage more people to bike in the City and reduce congestion.”

While there has long been a push by people who bike for more protected bike lanes — meaning bike lanes with a physical barrier between traffic and riders — the death of Tess Rothstein, 30, on Howard Street in March intensified the pressure. Her death spurred groups like People Protected Bike Lanes to stage protests along streets without bike lanes, placing their bodies where they believed bike lanes should be to save lives.

The new goal Breed set would effectively double the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s pace of building bike lanes. In 2017-2018, SFMTA built protected bike lanes at a pace of just over 5 miles per year, according to The Mayor’s Office. The mayor’s announcement came on Bike to Work Day.

San Francisco Bicycle Coalition Director Brian Wiedenmeier lauded her goals.

“On San Francisco’s biggest biking day of the year, Mayor Breed has issued a bold challenge to the SFMTA to quickly close the gaps in our citywide protected bike lane network,” Wiedenmeier said, in a statement. “Building out our infrastructure is the best way to improve safety and make it easier for people to bike to work, school or wherever they may need to go.”

bike-lanes-iii-5.9.2019.jpg

Breed said the increased pace will be possible if the SFMTA Board of Directors commits to her “efforts to streamline the process to deliver safety projects,” which she announced in March.

The SFMTA announced its own measures to beef up street safety for all traffic users, from pedestrians to drivers and also cyclists on Tuesday. One of those proposals includes beefing up its own construction staff, so that the agency can build out its own bike lanes without relying on outside contractors or other city agencies.

As for ticketing, the SFMTA reported roughly 27,000 citations for infractions related to blocking bike lanes in the second half of 2018. Breed tasked SFMTA with increasing those citations by ten percent in the next six months based on 311 data. Ticketing scofflaw drivers and parkers is the realm of both the Department of Parking and Traffic and the San Francisco Police Department, which will see a boost in its Traffic Company ranks after more training classes were called for by Supervisors Sandra Fewer and Rafael Mandelman.

https://www.sfexaminer.com/the-city/mayor-breed-to-double-pace-of-bike-lane-production-step-up-enforcement/

The Journal in a Snit. New York may release Scam Artist Trump Tax Returns

Had Trump’s Tax Returns been released in 2016. Had the full scope of his extracurricular activities, as in Access Hollywood, been more fully vetted, the Democrats wouldn’t need Trump’s tax return. He would have been dispatched back to where he belongs and doing what he does best. Scamming the public and acting the part of a con artist Reality TV Show toastmaster.

Wall Street Journal Editorial 5.8.2019

If Donald Trump’s claims of executive privilege are a threat to the Constitution, as his critics now claim, what are we to make of the unprecedented bill of attainder against Mr. Trump now moving through the New York Legislature? Every President in memory has claimed executive privilege, but New York Democrats want to hand over the state tax returns of one man, the U.S. President, to Congress.

Our friends at the New York Sun call this an act of “constitutional nihilism,” and they’re not overstating the point. Encouraged by Governor Andrew Cuomo, a Joe Biden man, the Albany Democrats are poised to pass legislation that would let the state tax commissioner release Mr. Trump’s tax return to one of three Congressional committees.

The Democrats figure they can thus leap in a single bound over the battle now taking place in Washington between Mr. Trump and the House Ways and Means Committee over Mr. Trump’s federal returns. They’re also leaping over the Constitution.

The Albany Democrats claim they aren’t targeting Mr. Trump because their bill would let the tax commissioner release any individual’s New York tax return to Congress. This is hardly consolation. Mr. Cuomo and such altar boys as former Gov. Eliot Spitzer would have the power to turn over the returns of any political enemy. And once in the hands of Congress, they might as well be posted on Broadway.

Trump tax returns 5.8.2019

Yet everyone knows that the immediate target here is one man, Mr. Trump. The rest is political cover. Why write the law now if not to assist Washington Democrats in harassing the President they loathe?

The ban on bills of attainder—laws targeting an individual—is as clear a constitutional principle as any in the great American charter. Article 1, Section 10 states that “No State shall . . . pass any Bill of Attainder.” The Founders wrote the passage to prohibit abuses that were common in England.

If Democrats want to go down this road, they should be ready for the boomerang. Both parties can use tax disclosure as a political weapon, and the Albany precedent will be repaid in kind by a Republican state legislature against a future Democratic officeholder. Recall that during the 1992 campaign Bill and Hillary Clinton hid Hillary’s implausible cattle-futures trading windfall in their undisclosed tax returns.

The fight over Mr. Trump’s federal returns is a classic struggle between legislative and executive branches held by competing parties. Congress says it has the power to see Mr. Trump’s returns from 2013-2018 under Section 6103(f) of the IRS code.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has rejected the House request on grounds that the law is “bounded by Congress’ authority under the Constitution” and the returns don’t “reasonably serve as a legitimate legislative purpose.” That’s the standard the Supreme Court has said should define the purview of Congressional oversight.

Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal says his legislative purpose is to assess how the IRS fulfills its policy of auditing presidential tax returns. But Mr. Neal has requested six years of returns, though Mr. Trump has been President only since 2017. Mr. Neal has also not sought the returns of previous Presidents while they were in office. In its breadth of years but focus on only one President, Mr. Neal’s request undermines his stated legislative purpose.

A court may settle this if the two sides can’t reach an accommodation, though that might take months or years. In any case a state has no business injecting itself in this federal checks-and-balances brawl. New York’s action is another example of the ways that Mr. Trump’s failure to observe customary political norms, albeit within legal bounds, has led his opponents to assume they can get away with anything in response.

Former California Gov. Jerry Brown was wiser in 2017 when he vetoed a state bill that said presidential candidates had to provide tax returns as a condition for being on the state primary ballot. “While I recognize the political attractiveness—even the merits—of getting President Trump’s tax returns, I worry about the political perils of individual states seeking to regulate presidential elections in this manner,” Mr. Brown warned. “First, it may not be constitutional. Second, it sets a ‘slippery slope’ precedent.”

We wish Mr. Trump would release his tax returns for political transparency. But he has no legal obligation to do so and his refusal doesn’t justify an abuse of state power. When it comes to violating the Constitution, some Democrats make Mr. Trump look like James Madison.

SF appears ready to Clamp Down Surveillance Tools

The scope of Orwellian surveillance is mind boggling. Even more disturbing is the fact people willingly give up their freedom and allow this intrusive behavior to continue and grow.  Even such supposedly benign groups as Next Door are the vehicle for neighbors to snoop and tattle on one another. It’s scary and indicative of the public mind set in the Trump era.

Excerpted from San Francisco Examiner 5.7.2019

“Right now, there is a pressing need to act,” said Matt Cagle, an attorney with the ACLU of Northern California. “The harms of unchecked surveillance are very real and they often impact immigrant and communities of color disproportionately.”

San Francisco residents may soon have more say over how and when The City government conducts surveillance.

Big Brother II 5.7.2019

Under legislation introduced by Supervisor Aaron Peskin, city departments will have to create plans for how they use surveillance technology and win approval from the Board of Supervisors before proceeding.

“This is really about giving policy makers the information that they need to safeguard these important technologies from abuse — not from their use, but from their abuse,” Peskin said.

Departments would have to disclose annually how they have used surveillance technology for the board and the public to ensure they adhered to the plans. The legislation also outright bans the use of facial recognition technology by city departments.

A number of other Bay Area agencies and cities includng Oakland have similar laws in place for the oversight of surveillance. The legislation has the backing of the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California.

Not everyone was in favor on Monday. The citizen group Stop Crime SF raised a number of concerns, arguing the proposal could jeopardize the Police Department’s use of surveillance footage from residents and private businesses.

But Peskin and other board members said this was a misunderstanding, and Peskin amended the legislation Monday to clarify that the Police Department can both receive and use the footage from residents and businesses.

big-brother-i-5.7.2019.jpg

Under the proposal, departments would have 60 days to submit to the Committee on Information Technology their existing inventory of surveillance technology, which they must post on their website. The city departments must also within 120 days submit use policies to the board for approval to continue using surveillance technologies.

To purchase new surveillance technology, the departments must submit to COIT a “Surveillance Impact Report” that offers details like cost, how it works, how it has fared in other places and how they will protect civil liberties.

No free ticket for Rose Pak. Foes rail at plan for Subway Station in her name.

Typical San Francisco political brawl where a brouhaha can arise over the naming of a station in The City’s new underground subway system.

Excerpted from San Francisco Examiner – Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez 5.6.2019

Some feuds continue even after death.

So it goes with Falun Gong, which lined up a rally of more than a hundred people at City Hall Monday afternoon to denounce the late Chinatown political advocate, Rose Pak (pictured below).

Rose Pak II 5.6.2019.jpg

The protesters were there in opposition to Supervisor Aaron Peskin’s resolution calling for the Central Subway’s Chinatown station to be named after Pak, who died in 2016.

Pak banned the group from the annual Chinese New Year Parade in 2006, when complaints arose that members were distributing leaflets in violation of the parade’s rules around political outreach. They sued but subsequently lost that legal challenge.

Falun Gong has opposed Pak publicly since that dispute.

Former Mayor Willie Brown exited City Hall right behind the protest Monday. A close friend and frequent ally of Pak’s, Brown had sharp words for the protesters.

Brown said that Pak’s name “will be the name of the Chinatown Station.”

“People are entitled to their opinions, but I don’t share it. Ed Lee wouldn’t share it. Pak saved Chinese Hospital” and helped get Central Subway built, he said. “Nobody else, not a soul up there (protesting), can match Rose’s record. Not even all of them combined.”

Shortly after Pak’s death, the Board of Supervisors urged the San Francisco Municipal Transporation Agency to name the station after her, citing her work to bring the Central Subway to Chinatown and to secure $500 million in grant funding from the federal government. However, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors later instituted a policy to name stations after geographic locations, saying station names need to clearly direct riders to nearby places.

This month, Peskin revived the effort, attempting to meet the SFMTA’s concerns by using the name “Rose Pak Chinatown Station.”

Monday, the Falun Gong voiced their opposition.

Protesters held signs aloft reading “IMMORAL ROSE PAK,” “NO ROSE PAK,” “NO ROSE PAK ANYWHERE,” and “‘BROKER’ OF COMMUNISTS,” referring to Pak’s long-time reputation as a power broker.

Rose Pak III 5.6.2019.jpg

While the group’s organizers did not immediately say the people standing on City Hall’s steps were Falun Gong members, they advocated for Central Subway station to be named instead for Sun Yat-Sen, whose ideological history in China is often praised by the organization.

“Falun Gong is just among the many groups” protesting, said Alicia Chen Zhao, a spokesperson for the protesters. Zhao said “several Chinese community organizations, as well as individuals, are involved,” but “because of the terror Rose Pak created in Chinatown, many organizations prefer not to mention their names.”

Proponents have called Falun Gong a spiritual movement while detractors including the Chinese government have called it a cult. Pak and the group were long at odds.

Zhao, the rally spokesperson, said it was peculiar Peskin pushed the resolution despite his critiques of Pak in the past.

https://www.sfexaminer.com/the-city/falun-gong-members-protest-naming-central-subway-station-after-rose-pak/

 

i

Israeli terrorism. Settlers destroy 120 olive trees in Palestinian territory

Typical harassment and aggression by Israeli authorities.  When has an olive tree hurt anyone?  Bibi Netanyahu may have an answer.

May 5, 2019

RAMALLAH (Ma’an) — Israeli bulldozers uprooted about 120 fruitful olive trees, on Sunday, in the al-Lubban al-Gharbi village, west of the central occupied West Bank district of Ramallah.
Fawwaz Salem, the former head of the village’s council, said that the uprooting of 120 trees came a month after Israeli forces delivered a military order to a local resident, Shafiq Abu Salem, informing him of confiscation of his private land near the al-Lubban al-Gharbi village, in order to pave a settler-only road in the area for the nearby illegal Israeli settlement of Beit Aryeh.
The 120 olive trees were planted across a plot of land of three dunams (0.74 acres).
Olive Trees 5.5.2019
According to Palestinians and rights groups, Israel’s main goal, both in its policies in Area C, in which more than 60% of Palestinian land is under full Israeli control, and Israel’s illegal settlement enterprise, is to depopulate the land of its Palestinian residents and to replace them with Jewish Israeli communities, in order to manipulate population demographics in all of historic Palestine.
More than 600,000 Israelis live in Jewish-only settlements across occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank in violation of international law, with recent announcements of settlement expansion provoking condemnation from the international community.
The Israeli human rights group B’Tselem reported that Israeli settlers’ vandalism in the occupied West Bank is a daily routine and is fully backed by Israeli authorities.
“In just over two months, from the beginning of May to 7 July 2018, B’Tselem documented 10 instances in which settlers destroyed a total of more than 2,000 trees and grapevines and burned down a barley field and bales of hay,” B’Tselem said in its report.
The report added “Settler violence and vandalism takes place with full backing by the Israeli authorities. Sometimes soldiers take part in the assault; at other times, they stand idly by. The police makes no substantial effort to investigate the incidents, nor takes measures to prevent them or stop them in real time.”

 

TRUMP IS SCARED OF DEUTSCHE BANK INVESTIGATION

I refrain from posting anything about Trump.  The Deutsche Bank scandal is too important to ignore. It lays bare the lying dishonesty for all the world to see.

Excerpted from Vanity Fair 5.3.2019

Of all the investigations into his dubious behavior, the one that most sets Donald Trump’shair on fire involves Deutsche Bank.

The German lender is famous for being the only institution that would loan the ex-real-estate developer money while everyone else treated him like the pariah he was, and presumably knows more about his finances than anyone outside the Trump Organization.

Deutsche Bank 4.17.2019

Earlier this week, the president, his company, and his three eldest children sued Deutsche (and Capital One) in an effort to stop the banks from responding to congressional subpoenas, and a new report from Bloomberg hints at why Trump seems particularly antsy about the idea of Germans telling Democrats everything they know: in addition to decades’ worth of information concerning his financial transactions, some people inside the firm have actually seen his elusive tax returns.

Per Bloomberg, in 2012, the Trump Organization was trying to obtain loans from the bank for the Trump National Doral Golf Club in Florida and the Trump International Hotel & Tower in Chicago. In the wake of the financial crisis, Trump had defaulted on a loan from the bank for the Chicago property, and in an absurd move even for him, filed a lawsuit against Deutsche, claiming it had caused the global financial crisis and “engaged in predatory lending against him.” (The bank promptly countersued, and the case was eventually settled.)

Having been burned by the bankruptcy king in the past, Deutsche initially balked at the idea of lending the Trump Organization its requested $100 million, at which point Ivanka Trump,the point person on the discussions, suggested her father would guarantee the loans with his personal assets.

That got Deutsche listening, but it insisted on performing due diligence first. And because Trump’s tax returns apparently contain information on par with the Pentagon Papers, their appraisal was carried out in a slightly unorthodox fashion. According to Bloomberg, the bank sent a team to the office of the Trump Organization’s chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, who “allowed the bankers to see relevant parts of Trump’s tax returns and take notes.” However, the bankers “weren’t allowed to make copies” of any of the records to take with them. It’s almost as though the returns contain information that might make Trump look bad!

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/05/is-this-why-trump-is-so-scared-of-the-deutsche-bank-investigation

Trumpistas rally in “Progressive” San Francisco at City Hall

Every Picture Tells a Story – Ongoing Series

Not a good omen when the Trumpistas ride into the Heartland of Progressive America

San Francisco Examiner 5.3.2019

A group of right-wing protesters gathered at San Francisco’s City Hall Friday for what was billed as “Rally for Free Speech” to protest perceived censorship by social media companies.

The protest drew around 50 to 70 people sporting “Make America Great Again” hats, pro-Trump signs and military-style clothing, as well as a smaller group of around two dozen left-wing counter protesters.

Fascists in SF II 5.3.2019

The protesters argued that the recent suspension of some far-right figures for behaviors such as bullying and hate speech demonstrates bias against conservative voices.

Prepared for trouble, city officials erected barricades around City Hall before the noon rally and dozens of police officers lined up between the two chanting groups of protesters in an attempt to keep them apart.

Fascists in SF III 5.3.2019

There was no violence, and no obvious weapons visible, but a number of angry verbal confrontations broke out between the two sides before the counter protesters left the scene and the crowd dispersed.

Fascists in SF IV 5.3.2019.jpg

https://www.sfexaminer.com/the-city/right-wing-protesters-rally-at-city-hall/

 

LIES LIES!!! Ex-BART cop ‘fighting for my life’ with Oscar Grant before shooting

This incident is just one blatant example  of the abusive and, in this instance, fatal criminal behavior of law enforcement.  Senate Bill 1421 was passed into law over the outrageous opposition of law enforcement. Now it is the Law in California and citizens can read the record of police misconduct.

 Excerpted from San Francisco Chronicle 5.2.2019

Former BART police officer  Anthony Pirone,who pulled Oscar Grant from a train 10 years ago and ordered his arrest before a second officer fatally shot Grant in the back,  lied repeatedly to investigators, telling them he felt he was “fighting for my life” when in fact he was the aggressor in the notorious incident, according to a newly released report.

Oscar grant III 5.2.2019

Photo above – Oscar Grant’s Family

“Pirone was, in large part, responsible for setting the events in motion that created a chaotic and tense situation on the platform, setting the stage, even if inadvertent, for the shooting of Oscar Grant,” concluded Kimberly Colwell and Jayne Williams, the two attorneys who authored the report dated July 31, 2009.

They cited Pirone’s “repeated, unreasonable and unnecessary use of force,” his “manifest lack of veracity” and his use of the word “nigger” while arguing with Grant in recommending the officer’s firing.

Oscar grant II 5.2.2019

The report by the Meyers Nave law firm — which BART hired to run its internal investigation due to a loss of public faith in the agency — long ago prompted the firing of the officer, Anthony Pirone. But the report was released only this week under California’s new police transparency law, Senate Bill 1421.

It details how investigators concluded that Pirone played a role in Grant’s death at Fruitvale Station in Oakland on Jan. 1, 2009, then sought to cover it up. Pirone was not criminally charged. But former BART Officer Johannes Mehserle was — and he was convicted of involuntary manslaughter after a jury accepted his explanation that he accidentally shot Grant while believing he was squeezing the trigger of his Taser.

https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Ex-BART-cop-said-he-was-fighting-for-my-13812158.php

 

German May Day. Tens of thousands take to the streets for worker rights

Germany is a country where Unions are strong. Workers have real rights and May Day is the annual commemoration to celebrate the labor movement. In America the Union movement has been trampled upon by unchecked mega corporations and their paidoff handmaiden political lackeys

Excerpted from Deutsche Welle 5.1.2019

German unions called on workers to take to the streets on May Day to push for a Europewide minimum wage. Organizers also called for stronger collective bargaining rights and urged workers to vote in upcoming EU elections.

Tens of thousands of marchers answered calls from Germany’s main trade unions — the German Trade Union Confederation (DGB), Verdi and IG Metall — to take to the streets on May 1 to demonstrate for increased workers’ rights.

May Day III 5.1.2019.jpg

The unions are demanding the implementation of a Europewide minimum wage as well as improved collective bargaining rights. Organizers also used speeches to implore workers to make their voices heard in upcoming European elections from May 23 to May 26.

DGB Chairman Reiner Hoffmann told Germany’s dpa news agency that “Europe stands for peace and increased prosperity.”

Workers of Europe unite

May Day II 5.1.2019

Hoffmann said systemic challenges such as digitalization, globalization, migration, and climate change were so massive in scale that nations alone cannot provide solutions: “In the digital era, work isn’t national — it’s European and global.”

Speaking to demonstrators in Leipzig, Hoffmann also addressed Germany’s stubborn east-west divide as regards the labor market, saying it was unfair that workers in the east had to work more hours for less money than their counterparts in the west.

He also railed against disparities in collective bargaining rights, saying, “Collective bargaining agreements must apply everywhere again.”

Hoffmann underscored the importance of upcoming European elections on a broader level, as well, emphasizing the need to keep right-wing nationalists out of parliament, calling them, “the gravediggers of an open, democratic and unified Europe.”

https://www.dw.com/en/german-may-day-protests-draw-tens-of-thousands-to-the-streets/a-48565398