Photography of Gregory Crewdson—”An Eclipse of Moths.”

In a time of non stop turmoil it is worthwhile to realize there is more to this world than the Audience of One. One day it will pass and we can engage in more peaceful pursuits.

Vanity Fair – Britt Hennemuth 10.8.2020

I’ve loved movies from day one,” says Gregory Crewdson during a phone call from his studio. “I loved movies probably more than any other art form, honestly.”

The Brooklyn-born photographer, who left New York 10 years ago for a new home in a converted church and neighboring studio in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, spent his childhood weekends visiting the Berkshires. “My family was very close friends with Pauline Kael and her daughter. At a very young age, she influenced me to understand the power of movies.” The power of Kael’s pen secured late-night private screenings at local theaters for Kael and her acolytes. “I still remember seeing [David] Lynch’s Wild at Heart and Blue Velvet.”

Since graduating from Yale Art School, Crewdson has made arresting images that suggest stories already in progress. “Even from early on, even from my first photographs, I was interested in bringing a narrative into the still image,” he says. “Then, it just grew from there. I consider myself a storyteller.”

Crewdson’s latest exhibit, “An Eclipse of Moths,” is presently running at the Gagosian Gallery in Beverly Hills until November 21. (Because of the pandemic, the gallery has made his new exhibit available virtually.) The artist is a favorite among some of Hollywood’s more esteemed collectors, including Cate Blanchett.

Gregory-Crewdson VF III 10.8.2020.jpg

The empty streets and tired civilians in the photographer’s work bear an eerie similarity to America during the pandemic. However, the series was made in 2018. “I could never have predicted that the pictures would take on this meaning. I was very aware of, while I was making them, of certain themes of brokenness, dislocation, and alienation. All the pictures are these vast landscape images with lone figures wandering through them. All my pictures, in one way or another, have a theme of alienation.”

In creating each of his images, Crewdson writes what amounts to a screenplay with his partner, Juliane Hiam. Each piece is meticulously planned with a team of production designer–like assistants, achieving a cinematic patina that can evoke the nostalgic inner monologues of Edward Hopper’s paintings, all while challenging American audiences to reflect upon our nation’s thorniest issues. “I have been working in the same general areas for many, many years now,” says Crewdson, as we virtually scroll through his images together. “The locations are really meant to be everywhere but nowhere, a coming together between the truth and fiction.”

Gregory-Crewdson VF IV 10.8.2020

 

In this particular series, each portrait was created in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, a suburban landscape on the outskirts of a run-down industrial city. “It’s about 45 minutes from my home,” says Crewdson. “Melville wrote Moby-Dick in Pittsfield, actually. Edith Wharton and [Nathaniel] Hawthorne lived in the area. That’s not directly important to the work, but I like building on certain traditions.” Crewdson admits he is inspired by the work of Norman Rockwell, an artist who worked in a neighboring town. “I almost see myself as connected to him, but it’s the opposite, you know? Where he would create a utopian world, mine is a darker, more alienated view of the same landscape.”

Gregory-Crewdson VF II 10.8.2020.jpg

We stop on one image in particular, The Cobra. It depicts a carnival ride of the same name, which is run-down and tired in an abandoned field full of shipping containers and junk. A woman stands on The Cobra itself, almost suggestively, eying a younger man, who’s standing shyly in the doorframe of a container. “She’s performing for him. The Cobra. Then, there’s certain things that you couldn’t even imagine or plan.” He directs my eye to graffiti next to the boy. “The 69 was already written on the door. That’s all the things of reality coming together, you know?”

https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2020/10/cate-blanchett-talks-with-photographer-gregory-crewdson

 

Big Brother in San Francisco?? Cops tapped merchants surveillance cameras

In the opening scene of “The Conversation” (1974), a Francis Ford Coppola film, a private security firm, positioned in buildings around Union Square, is taping a personal conversation in Union Square.

Fast forward to 2020 and the SF Police Department, apparently with the acquiesence of local businesses, utilized their surveillance cameras to spy on peaceful protestors.

No need to worry about the Fascist Trump in Washington. The same activity is occuring right here in allegedly progessive San Francisco.

Excerpted from San Francisco Chronicle 10.6.2020

“This case isn’t about a tip or even a targeted investigation, Saira Hussain, an attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation said. “It’s about SFPD harvesting a private camera network for an entire week of dragnet, real-time surveillance, in blatant violation of the law.”

Police State SF III 10.6.2020.jpg

Hussain added that such dragnet police monitoring could cause a chilling effect on future demonstrations.

Civil-rights organizations and activists sued San Francisco Wednesday, alleging police illegally tapped into a network of more than 400 surveillance cameras to keep track of police-brutality protesters this spring.

The suit, filed in San Francisco Superior Court, centered on the demonstrations that immediately followed the Memorial Day police killing of George Floyd, when thousands in San Francisco and elsewhere took to the streets to protest police violence against Black and brown people.

Plaintiffs’ attorneys claim that between May 31 and June 7, San Francisco police accessed real-time surveillance footage from private cameras in the Union Square area, without first obtaining necessary approval from the Board of Supervisors.

The Conversation VI 7.20.2020

Photo atop Union Square- The Conversation (1974)

A 2019 city ordinance bans city agencies from using, borrowing or acquiring surveillance technology without prior approval from supervisors, in all but emergency circumstances. The cameras tied to the suit are all owned and operated by the same private entity, the Union Square Business Improvement District, or USBID.

Emails obtained and released by the EFF in July show how San Francisco police requested and were granted access to USBID’s web of cameras, which include remote zoom and focus capabilities. 

Hope Williams, an activist who organized a June 2 protest in San Francisco and who serves as the case’s lead plaintiff, said tapping the surveillance cameras was “a tactic to keep people from speaking out.”

Williams and two other activists suing the city are represented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation — a San Francisco-based nonprofit that focuses on privacy protections — and the ACLU of Northern California.

“It makes it so that people think twice before they venture out to these protests,” she said. “It makes the job harder for organizers like Hope, who try to bring people out and get them to participate and speak up to try to end police violence against Black communities.”

Saudi female journalists I 7.18.2020

The plaintiffs are not seeking monetary damages, but rather a court order that would compel police to follow the city ban surveillance technologies.

EFF’s Hussain said such dragnet police monitoring could cause a chilling effect on future demonstrations.

“It makes it so that people think twice before they venture out to these protests,” she said. “It makes the job harder for organizers like Hope, who try to bring people out and get them to participate and speak up to try to end police violence against Black communities.”

The plaintiffs are not seeking monetary damages, but rather a court order that would compel police to follow the city ban surveillance technologies.

San Francisco police declined to comment on the lawsuit, deferring instead to the City Attorney’s Office. A spokesman for that office provided two letters in which San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott addresses the incident to members of the Board of Supervisors.

https://www.sfchronicle.com/crime/article/Activists-sue-S-F-claiming-police-tapped-15628516.php#photo-20013170

Hubby and wife attorneys hit with felony indictments. Pointed guns at protestors

Gun toting Americans need to be taught a lesson in tough justice.

Ironic that it’s officers of the Court, wife and husband attorneys, who face up to four years in prison. This is the couple which Trump paraded before the nation during the Republican convention last August.

It’s the best Trump can offer as an example of his soon to be exiled Make America Great Again campaign. 

These attorneys are the type people who have risen from the toxic swamp of America’s underbelly during the past four years.

Talking Points Memo 10.6.2020

ST. LOUIS (AP) — A grand jury on Tuesday indicted the St. Louis couple who displayed guns while hundreds of racial injustice protesters marched on their private street.

A police probable cause statement said protesters feared “being injured due to Patricia McCloskey’s finger being on the trigger, coupled with her excited demeanor.”

The incident happened June 28 as protesters were walking toward the home of Mayor Lyda Krewson, a few blocks away. They suddenly decided to veer onto the McCloskeys’ street, prompting the confrontation that was caught on cellphone video. It showed Mark McCloskey in front of the $1.15 million home armed with an AR-15 rifle and Patricia McCloskey with a semiautomatic handgun.

Al Watkins, an attorney for the couple, confirmed to The Associated Press the indictments against Mark McCloskey, 63, and his wife, Patricia McCloskey, 61. A spokeswoman for Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner declined comment.

Fascism and Trump II 8.26.2020

The McCloskeys, who are both attorneys, have become folk heroes among some conservatives. They argue that they were simply exercising their Second Amendment right to bear arms, and were protected by Missouri’s castle doctrine law that allows the use of deadly force against intruders. The case has caught the attention of President Donald Trump, and Republican Missouri Gov. Mike Parson has said he will pardon the couple if they are convicted.

The McCloskeys also were featured speakers on the first night of the Republican National Convention. They’ve accused the “leftist” Democratic St. Louis leadership for their plight.

But Gardner, a Democrat, charged the couple with felony unlawful use of a weapon. She said the display of guns risked bloodshed at what she called an otherwise peaceful protest.

Watkins said that addition to the weapons charge, the grand jury indictment includes a tampering with evidence charge. It wasn’t clear what led to that additional count, he said.

The McCloskeys contend the protest was hardly peaceful. They say protesters came onto the private street after knocking over an iron gate and ignoring a “No Trespassing sign,” and said they felt threatened.

Qanon at RNC I 8.26.2020

Nine people involved in the protest were charged with misdemeanor trespassing, but the city counselor’s office later dropped the charges. The city counselor’s office handles lesser crimes and is not affiliated with the circuit attorney’s office.

Mark McCloskey, after a brief court hearing last week, expressed anger that he and his wife faced criminal charges while those who trespassed onto his property did not.

“Every single human being that was in front of my house was a criminal trespasser,” McCloskey said on Oct. 6. “They broke down our gate. They trespassed on our property. Not a single one of those people is now charged with anything. We’re charged with felonies that could cost us four years of our lives and our law licenses.”

The June protest in St. Louis was among hundreds nationwide in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death in Minneapolis.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/st-louis-couple-indicted-for-waving-guns-at-protesters

Led Zeppelin sings the right tune. Supreme Court oks “Stairway to Heaven”

Even Rock ‘n Roll can make its way to the august chambers of the US Supreme Court.

The Justices, short one with the passing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, decided in favor of the iconic British band in its years long copyright fight over the song Stairway to Heaven. 

Deutsche Welle 10.5.2020

The US Supreme Court declined to hear the case, ending a years-long legal dispute over the classic rock song. The Led Zeppelin case has had a wide impact on other musicians facing their own copyright claims.

British rock band Led Zeppelin effectively won a long running legal battle on Monday over claims that they stole the opening guitar riff for their classic song “Stairway to Heaven.”

The US Supreme Court declined to take up a copyright case against the band, meaning that a decision made in March this year by a US appeals court will stand.  

The lower court in California court ruled that Led Zeppelin had not copied musician Randy Wolfe in the opening guitar riff to the song.

The Supreme Court’s move to not take up the case has effectively ended the legal challenge, which could have had massive effects on the music industry.

The case was originally filed in 2014 by musician Randy Wolfe’s estate, as Wolfe died in 1997 and never took legal action. Wolfe’s band, Spirit, had Led Zeppelin as an opening act during the British band’s first US tour in 1968. The song in question was written in 1971.

Led Zeppelin II 8.16.2019

Experts called by the plaintiffs in lower courts said there were substantial similarities between Spirit’s song “Taurus” and “Stairway to Heaven.” But defensive witnesses said the chord progression in Led Zeppelin’s song was so common that copyright did not apply.

Led Zeppelin guitarist Jimmy Page had said in a 2016 jury trial in Los Angeles that he had not heard “Taurus” until recently.

https://www.dw.com/en/led-zeppelin-wins-stairway-to-heaven-plagiarism-case/a-55168257

 

The queen of rock’n’roll: Remembering Janis Joplin

It’s sobering to realize that Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix and Jim Morrison all died within a short period of time.

Deutsche Welle 10.4.2020

Texan girl, blues queen and music pioneer: The iconic figure in the 1960s hippie and women’s liberation movement died 50 years ago, on October 4, 1970.

June 25, 1970: Wearing a purple suit, countless bracelets and a pink feather boa in her hair, Janis Joplin had a chat with TV show host Dick Cavett.

He asked if she often returned to her hometown, Port Arthur, Texas. No, Joplin said, excitedly adding that she was planning on going back for her 10th annual high school reunion. Asked about her former schoolmates, she said: “They laughed me out of class, out of town and out of the state. Now I’m gonna laugh.” It was a moment of triumph and of pain in the life of the megastar.

She would die less than four months after that Cavett interview.

The class reunion at the Thomas Jefferson High School in Port Arthur was filmed. She showed up in her typical eccentric hippie style — obviously a colorful foreign body among the rest of her former elegantly dressed classmates. Interviewed that day, she was asked who invited her to the prom night back in the day: “No one,” she replied. It appeared to still hurt.

Born on January 19, 1943 in the oil refinery town of Port Arthur, Janis Lyn Joplin was able to read before she went to school.

As a 14-year-old chubby girl with severe acne, she was bullied in school. She was interested in art and literature, and wrote poetry. “I started singing when I was about 17. I could sing. It was a surprise — to say the least,” she later said. She hadn’t realized how powerful her voice was.

Janis Joplin II 10.4.2020.jpg

Her inner liberation from her conservative milieu would eventually be noticeable in her appearance: Janis dyed her hair orange, wore men’s clothes or shaggy dresses. The girl who had an inferiority complex decided to start attracting attention. Parents didn’t want their children to hang out with her; she was seen as a bad influence.

Janis finished high school and trained as a secretary. She later studied art at the University of Texas in Austin. There, her provocative appearance led her to be named “the university’s ugliest man” in a frat boys’ satire magazine.

Read more:Who was Janis Joplin?

Newsweek 1969 Cover (Newsweek)

San Francisco’s counter-culture

At the age of 18 she moved to San Francisco — culturally light-years away from Port Arthur, Texas. She became an icon of the hippie movement. And her voice felt like an earthquake in the music scene. 

The unpopular high school girl eventually landed on the cover of Newsweek magazine. The article titled Rebirth of Blues described her as rock’s first female superstar, adding that at the 1967 Monterey International Pop Music Festival, “a volatile viol of nitroglycerine named Janis Joplin blew the rock world wide open.”

In Janis Joplin’s five-year career, she sold 15.5 million albums in the US alone and obtained international recognition — all while leading a rather self-destructive lifestyle.

It was later revealed that she wrote many letters to her parents during this period, constantly craving their recognition. As the singer would drink whisky and swear on stage, she wasn’t allowed to perform in Houston, Texas. Her parents reportedly found her provocative behavior appalling as well. Her family nevertheless stood by her until the end.

Janis Joplin I 10.4.2020

On October 4, 1970 Janis Joplin failed to turn up as scheduled for a recording session at Sunset Sound Studios in Los Angeles where she had been working on her album Pearl with her Full Tilt Boogie Band. A colleague drove to the Landmark Hotel, where she was staying, and found her lying on the floor, dead. The autopsy revealed the cause of death to have been a heroin overdose. Guitar legend and fellow hippie icon Jimi Hendrix had died only two weeks before, also age 27.

Only days before her death, Joplin had signed her will, including a large sum for her wake at Lion’s Share in San Anselmo, California. Sent to 200 guests, the invitations were printed with the message “Drinks are on Pearl.” The rest of her estate went to her family. 

https://www.dw.com/en/the-queen-of-rocknroll-remembering-janis-joplin/a-42219540

Police and anti-fascists clash with Neo-Nazis on Reunificiation Day in Berlin

Today is Reunification Day in Germany.  A day of celebration disrupted by neo-Nazi thugs who fought with both anti-fascists and the police.

This is a scene which is not uncommon in Germany as the stench of Nazism has never been fully eradicated. This type of neo-Nazi behavior is  common place in America.

Trump encourages this Nazi like behavior. Particularly after he told the reprehensible ‘Proud Boys’ to “Stand down and stand by” during this week’s Presidential debate.

Deutsche Welle 10.3.2020

A protest in Berlin by the German far-right ended in violent clashes with riot police and a blockade by anti-fascist demonstrators, as the anniversary of German reunification was celebrated elsewhere in the city.

Between 250 and 300 neo-Nazis clashed with police and counterdemonstrators on Germany’s Unity Day celebrations in an eastern district of Berlin on Saturday.

The demonstration, organized by the far-right organization Der III. Weg (“The Third Path”) in the Lichtenberg district, was blocked at both ends of its planned march by several hundred counter-demonstrators, who claimed victory after the far-right protesters were forced to find an alternative route.

Brandenburg Gate 5.2.2017

Historic Brandenburg Gate – Berlin  (Photo- Liz Heidhues)

According to the DPA news agency, the demo, registered under the slogan “The people want a future,” was faced with a heavy police presence in riot gear, supported with police dogs and a helicopter.

The counterdemonstrators, many from far-left groups united under the name “Berlin alliance against the right,” sat down in the path of the march, at one point barricading the road with shopping carts and other objects.

Some altercations broke out after the counterdemonstrators refused to comply with police requests to move, and though some were arrested, the blockade remained in place, public broadcaster RBB reported.

There were also repeated attempts by the far-right demonstrators to break through police lines, which resulted in violent clashes. In the end, protest organizers agreed to take a shorter route on their march.

Police said officers had been injured during the clashes, which saw “occasional stones and bottles thrown” at them, though it was not clear how many or how serious the injuries were.

Some social media posts also showed images of officers violently arresting both anti-fascist demonstrators and neo-Nazis.

https://www.dw.com/en/neo-nazi-demo-mars-german-unity-day-in-berlin/a-55149527

Edie Locke fled from “the thumping of those boots” Nazis. Edited Mademoiselle

Right until the end of her 99 yearlife Edie Locke was involved in fashion criticizing people in 2020 who refuse to wear protective masks during the pandemic, “Stay the hell away from poisoning your fellow women and men.”

Wall Street Journal 10.2.2020

In her late 90s, Edie Locke kept in touch with friends by texting and wrote a column for the newsletter published by her senior living home in Thousand Oaks, Calif. A few months ago, writing about the social and fashion implications of pandemic face masks, she noted that some people refused to wear them: “To each his own? Okay, but stay the hell away from poisoning your fellow women and men.”

 

The teenage Edie Laub, growing up in Vienna, knew about anti-Semitism. Still, when Nazi troops occupied Austria in March 1938, she was stunned by the reaction of schoolmates she considered friends. “Open the windows,” one shrieked. “It stinks of Jews.”

 In an unpublished memoir, she recalled as Nazi troops marched down her family’s street in Vienna. Along with her mother, she was forced to join other Jewish women scrubbing floors at a Nazi headquarters.

A year later, after months of waiting, the 17-year-old obtained a visa, said goodbye to her parents and fled to Brooklyn to live with relatives. In New York, she worked her way into advertising and fashion journalism and—under her married name, Edie Locke—served as editor in chief of Mademoiselle magazine in the 1970s, when it was still influential in both fashion and literature.

Edie Locke II 10.3.2020.jpg

Edie Locke (circa 1960’s)

Ms. Locke, who died Aug. 23 at the age of 99, mentored young designers, including Betsey Johnson, Ralph Lauren and Donna Karan. As editor in chief, she carried on the magazine’s literary traditions and hired Joyce Carol Oates to review books. The magazine, she said later, “combined fashion and beauty with feeding the mind.”

In the mid-1960s, she advised women who were contemplating the purchase of miniskirts: First, try it on, sit down in front of a mirror, cross your legs and “look at yourself realistically,” she wrote. Culottes or tent dresses were alternatives.

“Today’s reader wants to be shown, not told, about fashion, beauty or anything,” she told Women’s Wear Daily in the 1970s. “We will stay away from ‘this is how you must look.’ We’ll make a statement but not a dictation. We won’t give them any hope, no promises.”

Her advice to women seeking to break into the fashion world: “Take any kind of a job, clerical or secretarial, to get your foot in the door. It won’t take long for talent to be noticed.”

Executives at the magazine’s publisher, Condé Nast Publications, pressed her in the late 1970s to adopt a lighter and sexier tone, closer to that of Cosmopolitan. She resisted and was fired in 1980. Months after her departure, Mademoiselle published a guide to vibrators. “Everything became about sex and relationships,” she said later. Publication of the magazine ended in 2001.

Ms. Locke reinvented herself as a television personality. In 1981, she debuted as producer and host of the cable television series “You!” It featured fashion, diet and careers. She was later co-host of a fashion segment on a Lifetime cable show.

Edith Rosenberg Laub was born on Aug. 3, 1921, in Vienna, where her father was a buyer for a department store. She served as a tutor in Latin and math at her high school but was ejected, along with other Jewish students, after Nazi Germany’s annexation of Austria in 1938.

In 1939, she said goodbye to her parents at a train platform. At the border, guards confiscated her cheap watch, frisked her to make sure she had no other valuables and allowed her to keep the equivalent of $5 in cash. She traveled by train to Cherbourg, France, and crossed the Atlantic to New York on the Aquitania ocean liner. Her parents, after spending the early 1940s in England, joined her in New York.

 

“My German accent was atrocious,” she wrote later. A friend held tissue paper in front of her mouth and asked her to repeat words containing “th” and “wh” sounds. “If the tissue did not move, I had said the words correctly. His method worked.”

At an underwear factory, she was fired after a day because she couldn’t operate the sewing machines properly. Later she found a job packing toothbrushes into boxes and took evening courses at Brooklyn College.

She talked her way into a secretarial job at Harper’s Bazaar magazine and then worked for an advertising agency, where she wrote a fashion newsletter. Betsy Blackwell, editor in chief at Mademoiselle, noticed her articles and hired her as an assistant fashion editor in the early 1950s.

Edie Locke III 10.3.2020.jpg

Mademoiselle sent her on overseas trips to supervise fashion-photo shoots, including one of a model riding a camel. In the early 1960s, during a visit to St. Croix in the U.S. Virgin Islands, she met Ralph Locke, who managed the Buccaneer hotel. They married in 1963.

Ms. Locke is survived by her husband along with their daughter, Katie Aviv, and three grandchildren.

 

 

This story shows how screwed up and myopic are the Republicans in Congress

Trump is inWalter Reed hospital with Covid-19.  We could soon have a President Pence.  Are you kidding me?

Those around Trump are testing positive and falling like proverbial bowling pins.

Yet the moronic, stupid and myopic Republicans in Congress won’t even agree to a bill which will help keep employed tens of thousands of airline workers. Airlines are the kind of business which the Wall Street Journal falls all over itself to show the love.

Do not these moronic Republicans take a step back and realize that what is happening is a result of their self-centered and stupid behavior?

Wall Street Journal 10.2.2020

WASHINGTON—House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Friday she is willing to move forward with aid for airlines as separate legislation or as part of a broader coronavirus relief deal that Democrats and the White House continue to negotiate as carriers prepare to cut thousands of jobs.

The California Democrat called on airlines to delay the job cuts as Congress crafted the legislation. Mrs. Pelosi previously resisted passing a narrower bill focused on airlines, instead arguing for a broader agreement that included jobless aid, money for states and cities, and other priorities.

“This initiative is focused solely on the workers, keeping them on the payroll so these workers maintain their critical training and certification requirements unique to their industry,” Mrs. Pelosi said of an airline-specific bill.

But an attempt to quickly pass aid for airlines quickly fell apart Friday, with Republicans rejecting a Democratic effort to unanimously approve new assistance. Each party accused the other of sabotaging the process on the stand-alone bill, while negotiations on a broader package continued between Mrs. Pelosi and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.

Airline cutbacks I 9.30.2020

The pair spoke for 65 minutes Friday afternoon and were expected to continue negotiating.

Earlier this week, American Airlines Group Inc. and United Airlines Holdings Inc. said they would go forward with a total of more than 32,000 job cuts after lawmakers were unable to agree on a broad coronavirus-relief package. Both carriers said they would bring workers back if a deal is reached in the next few days.

Airlines received $25 billion in aid under the Cares Act passed in March. A stipulation of that aid was that the carriers couldn’t lay off or furlough any workers before Oct. 1.

Airlines had hoped they would be on firmer footing by the time that assistance ran out, but travel demand hasn’t bounced back. The companies have warned for months that they would need to cut staff when that date arrived unless they received another $25 billion to cover salaries and benefits through the end of March.

Lawmakers in both the House and Senate have worked on legislation targeting the airlines industry directly. Democrats said the Republican opposition Friday to extending the airline aid would imperil the livelihoods of airline workers.

“They don’t know how they’re going to make ends meet, feed their kids or anything else. All because the Republicans in the House of Representatives would not agree,” said Rep. Peter DeFazio (D., Ore.), chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.

A House Republican aide said Republicans hadn’t vetted the bill Democrats sought to pass and argued that the House should have advanced a separate airlines bill with bipartisan support.

Two bills introduced last month but not yet voted on in the Senate or House would extend about $25 billion to airlines, specifying that most of the money come from unused allocations previously approved by Congress. The legislation Democrats put forward Friday didn’t include measures to repurpose existing funds.

The airlines’ planned cuts have put more pressure on lawmakers who have negotiated on and off for months over an aid package that could include relief for airlines and other hard-hit industries like restaurants and small businesses. With fresh signs that the economic recovery is lagging without additional federal aid, Mrs. Pelosi and Mr. Mnuchin recently restarted negotiations on a new aid package after weeks of stalemate between the two sides.

Mrs. Pelosi said on MSNBC earlier Friday that the sides were moving closer to reaching a broader agreement.

“I think we’re coming to terms in terms of the money on crushing the virus, finally. But it’s the language that is important.…Some of our work that we’re continuing is to make sure that they agree to the language for a strategic plan,” Mrs. Pelosi said.

The House passed a $2.2 trillion bill Thursday, as Democrats largely coalesced around an updated proposal that still lacks Republican support. That Democratic bill, which would reinstate a lapsed $600 weekly supplement to unemployment benefits and provide another $1,200 direct check to many Americans, is a large reduction from a previous $3.5 trillion proposal.

Mr. Mnuchin put forward a $1.6 trillion offer to Mrs. Pelosi earlier this week, a small increase from the $1.5 trillion the administration had previously indicated it could support. The Trump administration’s proposal included aid for small businesses and airlines. Mrs. Pelosi and Mr. Mnuchin have agreed that the next bill should include another round of direct government checks to individuals and families.

In a letter to House Democrats on Friday, Mrs. Pelosi outlined five areas where Republicans and Democrats continue to disagree. She said disputes remained on jobless aid, money for state and local governments, tax credits for children, virus testing, and other funding priorities.

“We are expecting a response from the White House on these areas and others with more detail. In the meantime, we continue to work on the text to move quickly to facilitate an agreement,” Mrs. Pelosi said.

TRUMP TESTS POSITIVE FOR COVID-19

Breaking News 4.15.2019

Liz Crow II.jpg

THE FIRE NEXT TIME RAGES IN THE WHITE HOUSE

New York Times 10.1.2020

WASHINGTON — President Trump said early Friday that he and the first lady have tested positive for the coronavirus, throwing the nation’s leadership into uncertainty and escalating the crisis posed by a pandemic that has already killed more than 207,000 Americans and devastated the economy.