Leanna Louie, bounced from the San Francisco ballot for her illegal residency, has gone to San Francisco Superior Court in a last gasp attempt to save her candidacy as District 4 Supervisor.
City Attorney David Chiu investigated Louie’s illegal residency and issued a 13 page report which resulted in her disqualification by the City’s Elections Director. See attached.
Every Picture Tells a Story – Disgraced politician edition
Disgraced and rebuffed for her illegal residency.
Leanna Louie is suing The City and County of San Francisco to force her way onto the November 8 ballot as a candidate for election as District 4 Supervisor.
Standing in front of City Hall on August 30, 2022 the photo is sending Leanna a message
STOP!!!!!
Photo: Leanna Louie, who is attempting to run for District 4 supervisor, rallies with supporters outside City Hall on Tuesday, Aug. 30, 2022, in San Francisco. Noah Berger for The Standard
The Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco is bankrolling Proposition I, the November 8 ballot measure to destroy JFK Promenade.
This effort comes after FAMSF spent a year lobbying San Francisco politicians in its failed effort to kill legislation creating JFK Promenade on JFK Drive in Golden Gate Park.
Proposition J would affirm the legislation passed by the Board of Supervisors on April 26, 2022 and signed into law by Mayor London Breed on May 7.
Follow the money.
I have been digging through the San Francisco Ethics Commission website to dissect the finances of :
ACCESS FOR ALL, YES ON I, NO ON J, SPONSORED BY CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS AND OPEN THE GREAT HIGHWAY ALLIANCE.
Since launching its campaign in early June to destroy car free JFK Promenade the backers of Proposition I on the November 8, 2022 ballot the backers, primarily Dede Wilsey and the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco (FAMSF) have spent:
$412,128.03. At the end of July 2022 backers of Proposition I had received contributions totaling:
$258,725.65.
The biggest contribution was from Dede Wilsey: $200,000.00
At the end of July 2022 the backers of Proposition had a debt of:
$187,469.96.
Thus far in August the Proposition I has received several large contributions to erase this debt:
$50,000 from Jason Moment. President of the FAMSF Board of Trustees. His worth is approximately 589MM
$140,000 from the FAMSF.
In early September the total August report will be available on the Ethics Commission website.
Financial details about the FAMSF campaign to destroy JFK Promenade can be found at the San Francisco Ethics Commission website.
Let there be no doubt the effort to destroy JFK Promenade is a wholly owned and funded project by The Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco and its primary patron Dede Wilsey.
Diane Dede Wilsey gave $200,000 to Proposition I – aka Access for All – to pay mercenaries to qualify their insidious ballot measure for the ballot.
3. Committee Information ID 1449299 – Access for All, Sponsored by Corporation of the Fine Arts Museums and Open the Great Highway Alliance
As of the end of July 2022, the FAMSF has collected $285,000 in its profit driven effort to destroy JFK Promenade
Dede Wilsey and FAMSF CEO Thomas CampbellA person is known by the company they keep – Dede Wilsey. The woman whose deep pockets and political connections are trying to destroy JFK Promenade
Following are two links.
The first is the complete July 31, 2022 Statement filed by Access for All with the Ethics Commission.
The second attachment is a list of all the Paid arguments submitted by proponents of Proposition I – Access for All. These arguments will appear in the San Francisco voters handbook.
An enthusiastic crowd of all ages gathered on JFK Promenade to kickoff the campaign to make sure that JFK Promenade, the car free oasis in Golden Gate Park, stays that way forever.
Recreation and Park Manager Phil Ginsburg, Supervisor Rafael Mandelman, Walk SF Director Jodie Medeiros, Executive Director of the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition Janelle Wong, State Senator Scott Wiener, longtime cycling advocate Andy Thornley were just a few of the local luminaries who participated in the kickoff event.
Election Day is just 73 days away and it will be a tough fight.
Opponents of the initiative, led by San Francisco power player Dede Wilsey and the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, spent at least $200,000 paying mercenaries to qualify their self serving measure for the ballot. The goal. With their deep pockets and unlimited funds their insidious goal is simple. Destroy car free areas in San Francisco.
The People United Will Never be Defeated. This selfish attempt to turn back the clock in a time of climate change must be crushed on November 8.
The campaign will remind voters to Vote Yes on J for JFK and NO on Proposition I, the Measure backed by Dede Wilsey and the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco whose only Goal is Profit for their wealthy patrons to the detriment of The People of San Francisco.
Getting ready to campaign for YES on J for JFK PromenadeTalking about YES on J for JFK Promenade
A family affair – The best way to travel on JFK PromenadeSaturday morning on JFK PromenadeChecking out the action at the YES on J for JFK campaign kickoffYES on J – SAFE PARKS FOR ALLThe People United Will Never be Defeated
San Franciscans of all ages enjoy the YES on J campaign kickoff on JFK PromenadeAn abundance of bicycles
Vote NO on I the self serving ballot measure put on the ballot by the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco to destroy car free JFK Promenade and all car free areas in The City
The Wikileaks Whistleblower who exposed American human rights abuses in Afghanistan and Iraq performed a heroic public service.
Assange has been under house arrest, first in the Ecuadoran Embassy in London, and for three years in a British prison while his fight against extradition continues.
This is a human rights violation of the first order. The American government needs to stand down and let Julian Assange, now 51, get on with his life.
TIME Magazine – Political Prisoner of the Year – 12.27.2021
Excerpted from The Guardian 8.26.2022
The Australian prime minister, Anthony Albanese, has previously stated “enough is enough” regarding Assange’s ongoing detention.
Lawyers for WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange have filed an appeal against his extradition to the US, as the United Nations human rights chief lends support to the Australian’s cause.
Assange, 51, has been indicted on 17 espionage charges in the US and one charge of computer misuse over WikiLeaks’ publication of thousands of military and diplomatic documents leaked by whistleblower Chelsea Manning. The charges carry a maximum sentence of 175 years in prison.
The Guardian – Massive leak of secret files exposes true Afghan war
WikiLeaks says Assange’s legal team filed “perfected grounds of appeal” in the UK’s high court against the US and the UK home secretary, Priti Patel, who approved his extradition in June.
Assange’s lawyers argue he is “being prosecuted and punished for his political opinions”.
His wife said the prosecution was unlawful. “Overwhelming evidence has emerged proving that the US prosecution against my husband is a criminal abuse,” Stella Assange said on Twitter on Saturday.
“The high court judges will now decide whether Julian is given the opportunity to put the case against the US before open court, and in full, at the appeal.”
Assange remains in London’s Belmarsh prison, where he has been in detention since April 2019.
A UK judge blocked his extradition last year but the US government successfully appealed in the high court.
Julian Assange – Continuing subject of American DOJ harassment sits in a British Court
The appeal comes after the UN human rights chief, Michelle Bachelet, met with Assange’s lawyers and his wife in Geneva.
Advocacy group the Assange Defence Committee told AAP they detailed to her his deteriorating health, with the Australian publisher suffering a mini-stroke recently.
In America people can voice any opinion they want. No matter how racist, anti-Semitic or misogynist.
Words can hurt. Words have consequences.
A Judge in Germany used such quaint language in handing down a sentence. The Judge called the defendant’s extremist blogs “revisionist history.”
Excerpted from Deutsche Welle 8.26.2022
The Berlin-Tiergarten district court on Friday sentenced far-right video blogger Nikolai Nerling to a nine-month probation sentence.
Judge Stephan Markmiller said that Nerling had used provocative, far-right content in order to gain attention and influence in the far-right scene, and said that some of his content amounted to “revisionist history.”
The 42-year-old, who calls himself “The People’s Teacher,” was convicted, among other things, of insult and incitement in two cases and the use of signs of either organizations either deemed terrorist or otherwise outlawed in Germany.
In the video, the 93-year-old denied the Holocaust, as she had done many times before. For that and other acts, the Berlin regional court sentenced her to a one-year prison term back in January. The prosecution accused Nerling of having known that Haverbeck’s statements were contrary to established historical facts.
He was also charged with publishing another video in which he “deliberately wanted to attack and ridicule a man in his Jewish identity.”
According to the indictment, in 2019 he also published images on his channel showing someone giving the Hitler salute.
The Hitler salute, and various other Nazi symbols or gestures, remain outlawed to this day in Germany.
The noticeboard at a war memorial in Lüneburg documents the 110 infantry division’s role in the Holocaust
In his comments, he questioned the proven fact that the infantry division had deported people to extermination camps, before covering the board in tape.
Nerling, a former elementary school teacher in Berlin, lost his job several years ago because of the extremist content on his YouTube channels.
What did the judge say?
He said Nerling had intentionally played with voicing nationalist or ethnic sentiments or other provocations that were “on the knife edge of what can be prosecuted,” looking to test the law to its limits. In the cases in question, the judge said, he had crossed a line.
In addition to the probation period — slightly less than the prosecution’s request of eleven months — the bench fined Nerling €3,000 (roughly $3,000) to be paid to the anti-racist anti-far-right Amadeu Antonio Foundation.
The judge also warned Nerling’s supporters, about a dozen of whom had shown up at the court, that he would not tolerate them shouting statements or clapping during the proceedings.
Every Picture tells a Story. San Francisco Swamp Dwelling Political Opportunist Reactionaries Edition.
Soul sisters. Puppet DA Brooke Jenkins and anti-Semite Leanna Louie
Radical anti-Semite Leanna Louie in her own words and her Reactionary cadre Puppet DA Brooke Jenkins when she learned their political lynching of The Real DA met its ultimate success.
Congratulations, Brooke! We hit the Recall road running and we did it!! We recalled Chesa on 6/7/2022.
One month later on 7/7/2022, you are appointed by Mayor London Breed as SFDA. Today’s news of your appointment is only the beginning. We will continue to fight for the innocent, for the victims, for the people of San Francisco. If Chesa dares to run for office again in SF, we will make sure he will NOT get in any office!!
Go BROOKE!!! 💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼
The Real DA Chesa Boudin was politically lynched and Leanna Louie’s partner in the Coup d’etat Brooke Jenkins was named to replace him.
Quite a victory for two Reactionary politicians enabled with 7.2MM in MAGA money to ruin Progressive Justice in San Francisco.
153K of which went to the Puppet DA to pay her for “Volunteer” service in the political lynching of her one time Boss The Real DA Chesa Boudin.
Party time for Reactionaries anti-Semite Leanna Louie and Puppet DA Brooke Jenkins
The City’s daily morning newspaper is becoming a subsidiary of the Nextdoor Law and Order freaks. This incident is just more fodder for increasingly paranoid and uptight San Francisco.
Nightcrawlers Heather Knight @hknightsf and Dion Lim @dionlimTV would be in full battle mode bashing the Real DA Chesa Boudin. Sadly this true Progressive was politically lynched by the MAGA billionaires, a fearful electorate and shameless so called journalists like Knight and Lim.
A theme for these Nightcrawlers would be the classic Lou Reed song, “Vicious.”
One neighbor had it right. Michele Sahl, told ABC 7, “It’s really terrible because we shouldn’t do that to another human being, number one, and why can’t San Rafael take care of this? San Francisco tries to take care of its homeless people, not without challenges, but I’m very disappointed.”
Excerpted from The San Francisco Chronicle 8.23.2022
The San Francisco City Attorney’s Office is investigating the San Rafael Police Department after a marked patrol vehicle was filmed allegedly dropping a homeless man off in a residential area of San Francisco.
The incident was filmed by a resident of the vicinity of Lake Street and 14th Avenue in the Richmond District. The video was shared with ABC7 News, which first reported on the incident. The video shows an officer emerging from an SUV, and removing the man and his belongings before driving off.
Mayor London Breed talks with a homeless citizen
In a statement to The Chronicle, City Attorney David Chiu said, “It is disturbing to think another jurisdiction would drop off someone experiencing homelessness or mental health challenges in the middle of a residential neighborhood with no services or resources around. We need all cities and counties working together to solve our homelessness and mental health crises.” It was unclear what specific law or laws may have been broken.
“While we are just beginning to look into this, make no mistake — we will hold any jurisdiction accountable that is proven to engage in this behavior,” Chiu said.
This incident happened during daylight last month. The person can be seen on the video scattering his belongings after being dropped off on 14th Avenue near Mountain Lake Park. The neighbor who filmed the video asked not to be identified.
Homeless sleep one block from San Francisco City Hall
San Rafael police Sergeant Scott Eberle, who supervises the department’s Downtown Foot Patrol unit, did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Chronicle.
Earlier, he told ABC7 that the man had been picked up at Northgate Mall in the Terra Linda neighborhood of San Rafael after allegedly threatening a security guard at a retail establishment. The man was not armed and was determined by the responding officer not to be a threat. He asked that he be driven to San Francisco, and that request was granted by the officer’s supervisor.
“We made a mistake,” Eberle told ABC7. “That is what we did, we dropped this subject off in San Francisco.”
After being dropped off, the man started taking off his clothes and throwing rocks, possibly even lighting a fire in the field where he had been left. The neighbor who made the video called San Francisco police, who arrived on the scene at around 5:30 p.m. July 30 to find “a person in distress,” according to the incident report. Medics were summoned and the man was transported to a local hospital by the San Francisco Fire Department.
I want to learn all I can about the car bombing assassination of Darya Dugina as she drove from a wealthy Moscow suburb on August 20, 2022.
The Western media; New York Times, Wall Street Journal, BBC and Deutsche Welle are giving this blatant political hit major coverage.
It’s worthwhile to learn more by reading the Moscow Times which offers up a point of view not found in Putin controlled State Media. This is a major story which will have an impact on the now six month old war of aggression against Ukraine.
As expected the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) has already fingered an unlikely suspect. Kremlin watchers are scoffing at the FSB analysis.
What remains unknown is, “Who is really responsible?” We may never get an answer to that question.
Excerpted from Moscow Times 8.22.2022
Russia said Monday that Ukraine was responsible for carrying out a car bombing that killed Darya Dugina, the adult daughter of nationalist ideologue and Ukraine war supporter Alexander Dugin, as experts said the assassination would likely spook Kremlin loyalists.
The high-profile assassination — of which her father Alexander Dugin is thought to have been the intended target — has sent shockwaves through the Russian elite, with political experts suggesting it has likely made pro-war pundits and Kremlin supporters fearful for their lives.
Alexander Dugin at site of Darya Dugina’s assassination in a Moscow suburb 8.21.2022
Dugina, 29, died Saturday evening when a car bomb exploded in the Toyota Land Cruiser she was driving near Moscow.
Russian President Vladimir Putin described the incident Monday as a “vile crime” shortly before the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) said the person responsible was a Ukrainian woman named Natala Vovk.
In a condolence message, Putin described Dugina as “a Russian patriot.”
“The fact that Dugina was an ordinary political commentator expands the geography of fear — pro-Kremlin speakers will understand the war is not an abstraction and it threatens them personally,” political analyst Abbas Gallyamov told The Moscow Times.
A Ukrainian presidential adviser, Mykhaylo Podolyak, denied that Kyiv was behind the bombing, suggesting instead it was the result of Russian political infighting.
“Vipers in the Russian special services started an intraspecies fight,” he tweeted Monday.
At the same time, the killing provoked an outpouring of anger from Russian officials and pro-Kremlin pundits, who expressed few doubts Ukraine was behind the killing.
Darya Dugina carried the message of Russian hegemony and was a strident supporter of Putin’s aggression against Ukraine. She paid the ultimate price for her extreme views.
Russian state TV Channel One anchor Olesya Loseva said on prime time television that the targeting of Dugina was an “act of intimidation” and a “signal to all of us.”
State media journalist and war correspondent Alexander Sladkov said “it is impossible not to use the terrible crime as an excuse to confirm the worldwide threat of the Kyiv regime.”
The killing is likely to trigger “a radicalization of the conservative camp, which has lost one of ‘its own’ and craves revenge,” political analyst Tatiana Stanovaya said in a tweet Sunday.
The carnage in Ukraine which Darya Dugina unabashedly supported.
In a statement carried by Russian news agencies, the FSB outlined Monday its version of how the attack was carried out by Ukrainian intelligence.
According to the FSB, Vovk arrived in Russia last month and rented an apartment in the same building where Dugina lived. She supposedly tailed Dugina in a Mini Cooper using a series of different license plates, fleeing to neighboring Estonia after the killing took place.
Lee's Perspective 